12 Jun
2008
12 Jun
'08
7:51 a.m.
Hi Jelmer, On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 11:14:52PM +0200, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
How should I go about allowing more generic use? Would it be ok to break the existing API? Should I add a new call? I think the API can be extended without breaking it. The current call sets GSS_AUTH_P_NONE. If you want to setup real message integrity checking/encryption we can add these as parameters. We can also skip the part you ripped out by just jumping over it in case we pass in a NULL/NONE username. I'd be interested to know what kind of respone buffer you pass in in that case. Cheers, -- Guido