22 Jun
2007
22 Jun
'07
3:38 a.m.
Hi Brian, --On June 21, 2007 10:44:36 AM -0700 Brian Moseley <bcm@osafoundation.org> wrote:
hey all. i have a Cosmo bug (<https://bugzilla.osafoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7951>) that revolves around a CS-generated iCalendar object containing an ATTACHMENT property:
ATTACHMENT:http://www.example.com/test.jpg
RFC 2445 doesn't define an ATTACHMENT property, only ATTACH.
does CS actually generate this, or was it hand-crafted somehow? to the best of my knowledge it came to our attention during a CalConnect interop session.
Did this come from a CalDAVTester test run? I believe there are some erroneous hand-crafted iCalendar components in there that use ATTACHMENT instead of ATTACH. I need to fix that... -- Cyrus Daboo