Duh. Ok. I suppose it wont hurt to put the fat version on my computers. Thanks! -- Thanks, James Reynolds University of Utah Student Computing Labs james@scl.utah.edu 801-585-9811 At 3:01 PM -0800 11/4/05, Shantonu Sen wrote:
You missed a decimal. The symbols version is 51MB, which is correct. the Roots/ version is 7.8MB, which is also correct, for a fat (ppc+i386) kernel.
Because there's code for both PowerPC and Intel, it's about twice as large as the version on your running system in /
Shantonu
On Nov 4, 2005, at 1:57 PM, James Reynolds wrote:
I used darwinbuild to build xnu-792.6.22 and it seems to me the file sizes are a bit high:
ls -l Roots/xnu/xnu-792.6.22.root~1/mach_kernel -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 7790644 Nov 4 15:03 Roots/xnu/xnu-792.6.22.root~1/mach_kernel
ls -l Symbols/xnu/xnu-792.6.22.sym~1/mach_kernel -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 51211964 Nov 4 15:03 Symbols/xnu/xnu-792.6.22.sym~1/mach_kernel
ls -l /mach_kernel -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 4330232 Oct 3 21:04 /mach_kernel
How is it that the version in Roots is so much larger than the version with symbols?
After mounting a case system file system with permissions on, I just ran these 3 commands (fluff removed):
/usr/local/bin/darwinbuild -init 8F46 /usr/local/bin/darwinbuild -fetch xnu /usr/local/bin/darwinbuild xnu
Any ideas?
--
Thanks,
James Reynolds University of Utah Student Computing Labs james@scl.utah.edu 801-585-9811 _______________________________________________ darwinbuild mailing list darwinbuild@opendarwin.org http://www.opendarwin.org/mailman/listinfo/darwinbuild