On Apr 26, 2007, at 7:49 PM, Juan Manuel Palacios wrote:
IIRC this already came up once but went unresolved. Four digit version numbers are not that common, so this is probably an overlook for that case either in the "get_outdated_ports" tcl proc in port(1) (base/src/port/port.tcl) or in the "rpm_vercomp" C function of the Pextlib library (base/src/pextlib1.0/vercomp.c), used said proc. I'd appreciate it if one of you could search trac for a similar report and put it in the "Needs developer review" milestone if not already there, or file it from scratch if one does not already exist.
Thanks for the report and help! Regards,...
and for the immediate workaround, the port maintainer can bump the epoch. -- Daniel J. Luke +========================================================+ | *---------------- dluke@geeklair.net ----------------* | | *-------------- http://www.geeklair.net -------------* | +========================================================+ | Opinions expressed are mine and do not necessarily | | reflect the opinions of my employer. | +========================================================+