On Sep 10, 2007, at 6:18 PM, Juan Manuel Palacios wrote:

On Sep 9, 2007, at 4:48 PM, Jochen Küpper wrote:

On 07.09.2007, at 20:34, source_changes@macosforge.org wrote:

+ # -*- Mode: Tcl; tab-width: 4; indent-tabs-mode: nil; c-basic-offset: 4 -*- vim:et:sw=4:ts=4:sts=4

Shouldn't there be a "coding: utf-8" in there, at least for Portfiles?

Greetings,

Jochen

So, we need to come to a final agreement on the modelines we're going to impose/request in our source files/Portfiles:

1) Source files: # -*- coding: utf-8; Mode: Tcl; tab-width: 4; indent-tabs-mode: nil; c-basic-offset: 4 -*- vim:et:sw=4:ts=4:sts=4

2) Portfiles (it's the same as above, is that recommended?): # -*- coding: utf-8; Mode: Tcl; tab-width: 4; indent-tabs-mode: nil; c-basic-offset: 4 -*- vim:et:sw=4:ts=4:sts=4

3) Makefiles: # -*- Mode: Makefile; tab-width: 8; indent-tabs-mode: t -*- vim:noet:sw=8:ts=8

Any objections to those? Something to add? Is casing of keywords right (Tcl or tcl)?

I don't know if it makes a difference, not being an Emacs person, but I think the Mode keyword is supposed to come first. Also we should probably have file encoding in the modeline

# -*- Mode: Tcl; coding: utf-8; tab-width: 4; indent-tabs-mode: nil; c-basic-offset: 4 -*- vim:fenc=utf-8:et:sw=4:ts=4:sts=4

Once we agree on the exact formats we should document them and everyone should stick to them, even in the order of the components.