On Mar 19, 2007, at 4:38 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
That explains the delay in the review of the tickets that I've submitted; thanks to Elias Pipping for trawling through them :-) Could the wiki be updated appropriately?
Did it! Thanks for reminding me.
Hello Ryan! Could I please ask you to amend the TracTicketing Wiki entry again to list the new "Available Ports" & "New Ports" milestones in our roadmap? They still need polishing and I've called for feedback on them and on any new potential milestones developers and/or users might find appropriate, but my current idea is to keep a balance between enough milestones to allow for proper classification of our tickets but not too many to not spread things too thin (thus making it easy to get lost while searching for stuff). I'm thinking combining those two milestones with proper ticket "Short Summary" prefixes might work quite well: "NEW:" A new port submission These tickets would naturally fall into the "New Ports" milestone, so that particular prefix might be a bit unnecessary now; "BUG:" A problem - a port is not installing functioning as intended. "UPDATE:" A port update patch submission "RFE:" A request for enhancement - updates, new ports, or suggestions for how you'd like a port modified. All these tickets would be assigned to the "Existing Ports" milestone, so maybe these prefixes might still come in handy. Thoughts? Thanks in advance for your help! Regards,... -jmpp