I'll definitely look into it, thanks for the suggestions. On Jan 31, 2007, at 7:16 AM, Juan Manuel Palacios wrote:
Hey Kevin! Seeing we could easily grow the fuse category with a rather similar template for every port in it other than the two base fusefs and libfuse ports, or so I think, this would seem like great candidate for a new PortGroup code a la perl PortGroup, ruby, aqua, etc...
Do I have enough drag to encourage you to write the base code for the group? It shouldn't be too hard for you to take a look into the existing groups in base/src/port1.0/resources/group/ and figuring out the requirements and syntax ;-) Once written, the sshfs port could be rewritten as an initial test against the group before other ports leverage it... up for inclusion in 1.4 if time & testing permits, woot!
But other than that, MacFUSE PortGroup or not, kudos to you for bringing this into our repo, I'm sure many will have lots of thanking words for you, here are mine!
-- Kevin Ballard http://kevin.sb.org eridius@macports.org http://www.tildesoft.com