30 Oct
2007
30 Oct
'07
12:52 p.m.
On 2007-10-30 12:43:52 +0100, Anders F Björklund wrote:
Weissmann Markus:
Yes, but I meant this to be a per-Portfile choice so a maintainer can mark his/her port as being able to build in parallel. Doing this with the sledgehammer for all ports that use 'make' might be a bit too much. ;)
It is supposed to be the default... But broken ports might need some way of signalling so, maybe "build.jobs 1".
The bug could also be reported upstream, so that a ".NOTPARALLEL:" is added to the Makefile. -- Vincent Lefèvre <vincent@vinc17.org> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.org/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.org/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / Arenaire project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)