On Dec 10, 2007, at 11:42, Weissmann Markus wrote:
On 10.12.2007, at 18:27, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Dec 10, 2007, at 08:43, Weissmann Markus wrote:
On 10.12.2007, at 15:23, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Dec 10, 2007, at 08:16, Weissmann Markus wrote:
Hmmm... wouldn't it be much cleaner and easier to only have one variant "quartz" as "quartz" and "x11" are mutually exclusive anyway?
Since there is a choice to be made for x11 support or quartz support, I think it makes sense to list both of these as variants. The port should (and now does) ensure that exactly one of these is selected at all times.
well, I prefer to not making this a philosophical problem: With one variant, you get two different installations, with two variants, you get four.
That's certainly one way to use variants. That's the "checkbox" way.
In this case (gtk2), two of the four variants are "errors" and are then fixed (with the defaults variant) or with a user warning. I think it would be better to eliminate the problem altogether then trying to fix it's effects.
I prefer to think of this as the "radio button" way. It's perfectly acceptable to mark variants as conflicting with one another. That's why the "conflicts" keyword exists. If I were writing a GUI to install ports, I'd make it so variants were represented as checkboxes, except when the "conflicts" keyword is encountered, which turns those variants into radio buttons. See also my minivmac portfile, which has 5 variants for selecting which ancient Mac model you want it to emulate. Exactly one variant must be selected. All the variants conflict with one another, and one of them is the default: $ port variants minivmac minivmac has the variants: mac128k: Emulate a Macintosh with 128K RAM and 2 drives mac512k: Emulate a Macintosh 512K with 512K RAM and 2 drives mac512ke: Emulate a Macintosh 512Ke with 512K RAM and 6 drives macplus: Emulate a Macintosh Plus with 4 MB RAM and 6 drives (default) macse: Emulate a Macintosh SE with 4 MB RAM and 6 drives $