13 Nov
2007
13 Nov
'07
11:59 p.m.
On 13/11/2007, Ryan Schmidt <ryandesign@macports.org> wrote:
It would be better to use "svn cp" to copy the old port. By not doing this, the "svn log" of py25-gnupg gives misleading information: it claims the file just came into existence, created out of thin air, but in fact, it was based on another existing file. It would be better for the Subversion history to reflect that. "svn blame" would also be more useful as a result.
I realised I should have done this just after I committed, corrected in r31019 and r31020. Sorry for the noise. Cheers Adam