On Mar 6, 2007, at 00:00, Elias Pipping wrote:
I hate to break it to you but I guess glib2 will have to go to the same steps as openssl:
I have to agree with the earlier post in another thread that the openssl port has become quite a mess with this universal stuff, and I think it would be wiser if no other ports copied that code. Copying code means you've missed a chance for creating a reusable function. Someone who understands all of what was written in the openssl port (and I don't, because I just glanced at it) should figure out how to make useful reusable functions that can be incorporated into the base of MacPorts, rather than duplicate most of it in several other ports, each time making ultimate cleanup of the situation more involved.