2008/2/7, Ryan Schmidt <ryandesign@macports.org>:
On Feb 7, 2008, at 09:10, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
On 2008-02-07 15:21:41 +0100, Thomas de Grivel wrote:
2008/2/7, Ryan Schmidt:
It was proposed that -devel ports should be updated to the latest stable version, if the latest stable version is newer than the latest development version. If we act on this proposal, then "-latest" is more intuitive than "-devel".
Ok I see the point. In other terms it is a pointer to a stable or -devel version of the same port, like a virtual package depending on the right one ?
Yes, more or less.
Actually no, I was not intending for there to be any virtual packages.
Let's do an example. The way it is now, "mysql5" is the latest released version of MySQL (5.0.51) and "mysql5-devel" is the latest development version (5.1.22-rc). Let us now assume for the sake of this example that the next version of MySQL that is released is 5.1.25 and it is considered a released version. To follow our current practices, "mysql5" will be updated to 5.1.25 and "mysql5-devel" will not be updated and will remain at 5.1.22-rc, until a development version of MySQL 5.2 is released. Or maybe it will switch to version 6.0 at that point.
The proposal is that when the hypothetical stable version 5.1.25 is released, "mysql5" will be updated to 5.1.25, and "mysql5-devel" will also be updated to 5.1.25. Both ports will then be identical until the next development release.
Put this way indeed it really sounds right. Sorry if I misunderstood the other explanations. -- Thomas de Grivel