Juan Manuel Palacios wrote:
Up until now we've uploaded tarballs and other distfiles to our distfiles section in svn to user named directories, together with a /distfiles/general dir for unmaintained ports. It's been discussed that using port name based directories is more natural and straight forward for the purpose of the /distfiles directory, so I wanted to poll you all on making such move.
I have two proposals: 1) distfiles/${category}/${name} Hierarchy matching the ports tree. Using name only results in a long list if we add files for more ports. 2) trunk/dports/${category}/${name}/distfiles Although that would mix up sources only and binaries in the same tree, if that matters (e.g. on branching/tagging). But with this solution all files belonging to a port would be together at one place. Rainer