15 Apr
2007
15 Apr
'07
3:41 a.m.
On Apr 15, 2007, at 12:32 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
I see what you meant now. :)
So, these changes you're making... are they the solution to the problem I reported when I want to define my own universal variant? Should I be (as soon as released MacPorts supports it) using "universal_variant no" before defining my own universal variant?
No. You just define your own universal variant with: variant universal { # Your code goes here. } As a matter of fact, if you do: variant universal { # some code } universal_variant no You'll end up having no universal variant in your portfile. But this is an undocumented behavior. Paul