On 10.12.2007, at 18:27, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Dec 10, 2007, at 08:43, Weissmann Markus wrote:
On 10.12.2007, at 15:23, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Dec 10, 2007, at 08:16, Weissmann Markus wrote:
Hmmm... wouldn't it be much cleaner and easier to only have one variant "quartz" as "quartz" and "x11" are mutually exclusive anyway?
Since there is a choice to be made for x11 support or quartz support, I think it makes sense to list both of these as variants. The port should (and now does) ensure that exactly one of these is selected at all times.
well, I prefer to not making this a philosophical problem: With one variant, you get two different installations, with two variants, you get four. In this case (gtk2), two of the four variants are "errors" and are then fixed (with the defaults variant) or with a user warning. I think it would be better to eliminate the problem altogether then trying to fix it's effects.
This way it wouldn't be necessary to explain to a user why the selection "x11 and quartz" he just made is illegal.
I didn't think they were mutually exclusive?
"\n\nThe gtk2 port can be built and installed with support for either Quartz\n(Aqua) rendering or X11 rendering, but not both.\n \n" [1]
[1] https://trac.macosforge.org/projects/macports/browser/trunk/ dports/x11/gtk2/Portfile?rev=31844
Oh hey, so it is. I marked the +x11 and +quartz variants as conflicting with one another in r31870. That should do it.
s.o. Regards, -Markus --- Dipl. Inf. (FH) Markus W. Weissmann http://www.mweissmann.de/ http://www.macports.org/