That's what I thought, from the guide, but went with what lint told me at the time :( Happy to add them back in once someone decides on a standard. b On Feb 5, 2008, at 12:34 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Feb 5, 2008, at 07:40, brett@macports.org wrote:
Revision: 33790 http://trac.macosforge.org/projects/macports/changeset/33790 Author: brett@macports.org Date: 2008-02-05 05:40:09 -0800 (Tue, 05 Feb 2008)
Log Message: ----------- linted
Modified Paths: -------------- trunk/dports/devel/cut/Portfile
Modified: trunk/dports/devel/cut/Portfile =================================================================== --- trunk/dports/devel/cut/Portfile 2008-02-05 13:28:15 UTC (rev 33789) +++ trunk/dports/devel/cut/Portfile 2008-02-05 13:40:09 UTC (rev 33790) @@ -1,12 +1,11 @@ -# -*- coding: utf-8; mode: tcl; tab-width: 4; indent-tabs-mode: nil; \ -# c-basic-offset: 4 -*- vim:fenc=utf-8:filetype=tcl:et:sw=4:ts=4:sts=4 # $Id$
[snip]
Actually, we are trying to *add* modelines to portfiles, not remove them, though I wish we would standardize on a single modeline and not just whatever someone feels like using.
"port lint" in MacPorts 1.6.0 is broken in its check for modelines. This was fixed in trunk already:
http://trac.macosforge.org/projects/macports/ticket/13496
!DSPAM:47a8a27a618281433542597!