are you saying we need additional ports like readline50 readline 51 readline 52? Regards, Elias On Mar 20, 2007, at 1:48 PM, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
On 2007-03-19 21:37:19 -0700, source_changes@macosforge.org wrote:
Revision: 22947 http://trac.macosforge.org/projects/macports/changeset/ 22947 Author: pipping@macports.org Date: 2007-03-19 21:37:19 -0700 (Mon, 19 Mar 2007)
Log Message: ----------- * bump version to 5.2 * add links for 5.[01]'s libs (should fix #9897, #9335, please confirm)
I'm not sure that this is correct. If the library name has changed, this normally mean that the API is not backward compatible, in which case adding symlinks would be incorrect.
-- Vincent Lefèvre <vincent@vinc17.org> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.org/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.org/ blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / Arenaire project (LIP, ENS- Lyon) _______________________________________________ macports-dev mailing list macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev