(same mail as before, resent with a proper subject!) Good afternoon everyone! At long last, I consider the work on my dp2mp-move branch almost 100% done, 99.99% lets say ;-) Here's a doc explaining all the implications moving to these sources has: http://trac.macports.org/projects/macports/wiki/MacPortsRenaming I'd love to get as much feedback as possible on all the renaming and moves, and an overall opinion of how things look like in a standard MacPorts installation after upgrading to this branch. I ask because this branch moves stuff like "/opt/local/var/db/dports/sources/ rsync.rsync.darwinports.org_dpupdate_dports" to "/opt/local/var/ macports/sources/rsync.macports.org/release/ports", as explained in the wiki doc, so if the chosen new paths are not what the majority regards as the best choice, corrections could be easily made before these sources are distributed to the masses. It is my intention to merge all of the branch back into trunk ASAP, after consensus is reached on best "new conventions", since people writing code against current trunk will surely have to rewrite some parts of it after this is merged, albeit changes will hopefully be small. Nevertheless, I'd very much like to minimize this negative (and quite hateful, I understand) side effect. And finally, I say "almost 100%" and not "100%" because there are still a couple of small pending things, detailed in the "Pending" section of the doc. Taking care of them shouldn't take too long at all (remaining 0.01% ;-) Regards,.... -jmpp PS: The branch mirrors trunk minus sfiera's latest commit, which we could easily merge. Therefore merging should be painless, other than the drawback detailed above. Also, branch has been tested extensively and everything works "as expected", but please do not hesitate to send me any feedback/error reports. Thanks!