Re: Draft of a minimalist MacPorts Guide
Hi Mark! I've only managed to skim over your draft but I think it seems pretty good to begin with, kudos! Even though the existing guide is pretty outdated in some aspects, I wouldn't know where to stand between this draft of yours and our existing sources (there is some good material there!), haven't really had the time to do any serious comparisons. I'd love it if you could team up with Maun Suang and Brian Campbell, who've been actively contributing to documentation lately, and come up with a plan to rewrite as much as you can while keeping the best of both. Doing it in docbook format would be sweet, we already have automated guide regen straight off svn sources going on Daniel Luke's box, meaning that whatever we commit to the doc/ svn dir is reflected on the regen'd html files automagically, no fuss! (what's the regen periodicity, Daniel?). We also have a temporary location for the guide up at Daniel's site (http://geeklair.net/macports_guide/), but I am coordinating with Kevin Van Vechten a move to MacOSForge servers with a static link to it and automated uploads, this time for real. We're are also working on a mechanism to grant wiki write access to documentation contributors who do not yet have full svn write access, so that we can broaden our contributors base in a much faster and way. I'll get back to everybody once all this is in place, though. So as you can see, we already have this ball rolling with revived energies, so I'd really love it if you could team up and work people like Maun Suang and Brian (and any other willing to dedicate some time to this, most welcome!), providing your new draft as a base for a major guide redesign and refresh. Again, kudos for this great effort! Regards,... -jmpp On Jul 5, 2007, at 4:10 PM, markd@macports.org wrote:
I think the structure of the original guide is fundamentally flawed. I cooked up a draft of a minimalist approach. What do y'all think?
http://homepage.mac.com/duling/macports/guide.html
I used the stylesheet from another document I had handy, so don't mind the format or the fact that it isn't chunked. The colors and text of the original guide make it look more professional I think but I didn't have time to mess with the stylesheet, especially since I don't know if people will really like this approach anyway.
Mark
_______________________________________________ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
Juan Manuel Palacios <jmpp@macports.org> on Thursday, July 5, 2007 at 11:34 PM -0800 wrote:
Even though the existing guide is pretty outdated in some aspects, I wouldn't know where to stand between this draft of yours and our existing sources (there is some good material there!), haven't really had the time to do any serious comparisons.
Oops, resending to the lists with my subscribed address .... Yes there is good stuff in the old Guide. I am mining it for all I can to make sure that nothing in it gets left out, but I just got started and I'm not done yet. Or perhaps the more advanced stuff in the old Guide won't easily fit into my "minimalist" Guide; if so it can be accomodated separately. Either way, I don't want to leave anything out.
I'd love it if you could team up with Maun Suang and Brian Campbell, who've been actively contributing to documentation lately, and come up with a plan to rewrite as much as you can while keeping the best of both.
Yes, I have the same idea.
Doing it in docbook format would be sweet
Yes I thought so too. DocBook gives a lot of flexibility. Mark
participants (2)
-
Juan Manuel Palacios
-
markd@macports.org