Hello, Shouldn't the x86 variant be transformed in a darwin i386 platform? -- Anthony Ramine, a lazy french student. nox@macports.org
On May 27, 2007, at 11:43, N_Ox wrote:
Shouldn't the x86 variant be transformed in a darwin i386 platform?
Or removed. All it does is modify the configure script as follows: $ cat files/patch-builds-unix-configure --- builds/unix/configure Sat Apr 24 16:43:36 2004 +++ configure.new Wed Nov 17 02:14:03 2004 @@ -3045,7 +3045,7 @@ if test "x$CC" = xgcc; then XX_CFLAGS="-Wall" - XX_ANSIFLAGS="-pedantic -ansi" + XX_ANSIFLAGS="-pedantic -std=c99" else case "$host" in *-dec-osf*) This was added on 2004-11-16 in r9312 to fix bug #1653: http://trac.macosforge.org/projects/macports/changeset/9312 http://trac.macosforge.org/projects/macports/ticket/1653 It looks like freetype 2.1.7 wouldn't install on a non-Mac pure- Darwin 7 system until patched. I've had freetype installed on my Intel Mac for awhile so I obviously didn't run into the issue the patch was trying to fix. So it either applies only to pure Darwin, or it only applies to Darwin 7 / Mac OS X 10.3, or it doesn't apply at all anymore with current freetype. Since I haven't had any problem reports from Mac users, and we don't support pure Darwin anymore, I'm inclined to remove this entirely. Thoughts?
Le 27 mai 07 à 22:09, Ryan Schmidt a écrit :
On May 27, 2007, at 11:43, N_Ox wrote:
Shouldn't the x86 variant be transformed in a darwin i386 platform?
Or removed. All it does is modify the configure script as follows:
(...)
This was added on 2004-11-16 in r9312 to fix bug #1653:
http://trac.macosforge.org/projects/macports/changeset/9312
http://trac.macosforge.org/projects/macports/ticket/1653
It looks like freetype 2.1.7 wouldn't install on a non-Mac pure- Darwin 7 system until patched. I've had freetype installed on my Intel Mac for awhile so I obviously didn't run into the issue the patch was trying to fix. So it either applies only to pure Darwin, or it only applies to Darwin 7 / Mac OS X 10.3, or it doesn't apply at all anymore with current freetype. Since I haven't had any problem reports from Mac users, and we don't support pure Darwin anymore, I'm inclined to remove this entirely. Thoughts?
Since it's unsupported now, we should remove it. That will only make the tree cleaner the tree. -- Anthony Ramine, a lazy french student. nox@macports.org
On May 27, 2007, at 15:26, N_Ox wrote:
Shouldn't the x86 variant be transformed in a darwin i386 platform?
Or removed. All it does is modify the configure script as follows:
(...)
This was added on 2004-11-16 in r9312 to fix bug #1653:
http://trac.macosforge.org/projects/macports/changeset/9312
http://trac.macosforge.org/projects/macports/ticket/1653
It looks like freetype 2.1.7 wouldn't install on a non-Mac pure- Darwin 7 system until patched. I've had freetype installed on my Intel Mac for awhile so I obviously didn't run into the issue the patch was trying to fix. So it either applies only to pure Darwin, or it only applies to Darwin 7 / Mac OS X 10.3, or it doesn't apply at all anymore with current freetype. Since I haven't had any problem reports from Mac users, and we don't support pure Darwin anymore, I'm inclined to remove this entirely. Thoughts?
Since it's unsupported now, we should remove it. That will only make the tree cleaner the tree.
I removed it.
participants (2)
-
N_Ox
-
Ryan Schmidt