mww, the pgpool maintainer, is busy, so I'm sending this out for broader discussion... There is a port for pgpool, but there has been a rewrite of that project into what is being called pgpool-II. They create some of the same binaries, but since one is a rewrite of the other, should they be kept as separate ports? I believe pgpool-II has all of the features of pgpool and supersedes it, but maybe someone still wants pgpool around. I would like to use pgpool-II of course. I have a rudimentary Portfile which works for pgpool-II. So should I also come up with a patch for pgpool to separate out the binary directories so the two ports dont overwrite each other (similar to how postgresql is kept separate)? Or should I make a patch for pgpool's port which treats pgpool-II as the latest/current version and keep them as 1 port? -Bill ---- William Siegrist Software Support Engineer Mac OS Forge http://macosforge.org/ wsiegrist@apple.com 408 862 7337