Hello, I've created a updated portfile for RubyCocoa. However I have a few questions: First I would like to change the name from rb-cocoa to rb-rubycocoa since that's the real name. Is this allowed? Second, I'm not allowed to use the universal variant because it's not a configure script based installation. Is there some way to override this? Because now I have a builduniversal variant, but this is not so nice... Portfile: http://pastie.textmate.org/74998 Note: I haven't yet updated the description. Cheers, Eloy
Also, is it just me or is rubygems in macports broken? $ gem /opt/local/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:27:in `gem_original_require': no such file to load -- sources (LoadError) from /opt/local/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:27:in `require' from /opt/local/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/1.8/rubygems/source_info_cache.rb:6 from /opt/local/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:27:in `gem_original_require' from /opt/local/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:27:in `require' from /opt/local/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/1.8/rubygems/remote_installer.rb:12 from /opt/local/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:27:in `gem_original_require' from /opt/local/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:27:in `require' from /opt/local/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/1.8/rubygems.rb:112:in `manage_gems' from /opt/local/bin/gem:10 On 6/30/07, Eloy Duran <eloy.de.enige@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,
I've created a updated portfile for RubyCocoa. However I have a few questions:
First I would like to change the name from rb-cocoa to rb-rubycocoa since that's the real name. Is this allowed?
Second, I'm not allowed to use the universal variant because it's not a configure script based installation. Is there some way to override this? Because now I have a builduniversal variant, but this is not so nice...
Portfile: http://pastie.textmate.org/74998 Note: I haven't yet updated the description.
Cheers,
Eloy
Hi Eloy, On 01/07/2007, at 00:59, Eloy Duran wrote:
Also, is it just me or is rubygems in macports broken?
$ gem /opt/local/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:27:in `gem_original_require': no such file to load -- sources (LoadError) from /opt/local/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/1.8/rubygems/ custom_require.rb:27:in `require' from /opt/local/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/1.8/rubygems/ source_info_cache.rb:6 from /opt/local/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/1.8/rubygems/ custom_require.rb:27:in `gem_original_require' from /opt/local/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/1.8/rubygems/ custom_require.rb:27:in `require' from /opt/local/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/1.8/rubygems/ remote_installer.rb:12 from /opt/local/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/1.8/rubygems/ custom_require.rb:27:in `gem_original_require' from /opt/local/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/1.8/rubygems/ custom_require.rb:27:in `require' from /opt/local/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/1.8/rubygems.rb:112:in `manage_gems' from /opt/local/bin/gem:10
This is a known problem that is proving rather difficult to track down. I sent an email to the macports-users list a couple of days ago, though, to ask people to test a possible workaround, and I was wondering if you could do the same: try force-upgrading rb-rubygems using "port -ufn upgrade rb-rubygems" and see if it works then. I didn't have the problem until I recently did a clean install, but then it went away after I upgraded from 0.9.2 to 0.9.4, so I want to see if a forced upgrade to the same version has the same effect. Kind regards, Maun Suang -- Boey Maun Suang (Boey is my surname) Email: boeyms at macports dot org
On Jun 30, 2007, at 09:48, Eloy Duran wrote:
Second, I'm not allowed to use the universal variant because it's not a configure script based installation. Is there some way to override this? Because now I have a builduniversal variant, but this is not so nice...
It should suffice to just redefine the universal variant: variant universal { configure.args-append --build-universal=yes }
participants (3)
-
Boey Maun Suang
-
Eloy Duran
-
Ryan Schmidt