On Oct 8, 2007, at 4:24 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:

http://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macports-users/2007-October/ thread.html

shows messages up thru October 8, which is correct. But this page:

http://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macports-users/2007-October/

only shows messages up thru October 2. What's up with this?

Where do you see that second link? -- Daniel J. Luke +========================================================+ | *---------------- dluke@geeklair.net ----------------* | | *-------------- http://www.geeklair.net -------------* | +========================================================+ | Opinions expressed are mine and do not necessarily | | reflect the opinions of my employer. | +========================================================+

On Oct 8, 2007, at 16:12, Juan Manuel Palacios wrote:

On Oct 8, 2007, at 4:24 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:

...

This page

http://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macports-users/2007-October/ thread.html

shows messages up thru October 8, which is correct. But this page:

http://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macports-users/2007-October/

only shows messages up thru October 2. What's up with this?

Same goes for

http://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macports-dev/2007-October/ thread.html

(which is up to date) and

http://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macports-dev/2007-October/

(which isn't). Why do we have 2 URLs per mailing list which are supposed to list the same thing, but one of which is out of date? Perhaps one should just be a redirect to the other. Or perhaps there's a pipermail configuration that's amiss.

It's possible that this is due to the current migration Mac OS Forge is undergoing to new hardware. Services are being migrated piecemeal to minimize downtime, so some things falling a bit behind others is to be expected for the duration.

The new Mac OS Forge admin, Bill Siegrist, is working very hard to get us up and running as fast an functional as possible, so I'm sure any abnormal condition like this will be dealt with sooner than later.

Regards (and thanks to Bill for his great work!),...

Oh right! I forgot that was happening. I'll shut up for awhile. :) On Oct 8, 2007, at 15:45, Daniel J. Luke wrote:

Where do you see that second link? [the one ending in "/" -Ryan]

Guess I didn't see it anywhere; I just manipulated the URL in my browser, as I often do. It seemed a logical URL to try.