October 2015 - macports-tickets - lists.macosforge.org

Re: [MacPorts] #38906: Error: Processing of port keepassx failed
by MacPorts 07 Oct '15

07 Oct '15

#38906: Error: Processing of port keepassx failed ------------------------+-------------------------------- Reporter: gaga335@… | Owner: macports-tickets@… Type: defect | Status: reopened Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: 2.1.3 Resolution: | Keywords: Port: KeePassX | ------------------------+-------------------------------- Comment (by davide.liessi@…): Replying to [comment:18 davide.liessi@…]: > I can try with clang-3.4 though. `sudo port -t configure KeePassX configure.compiler=macports-clang-3.4` completed without errors. -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/38906#comment:19> MacPorts <https://www.macports.org/> Ports system for OS X

1 0

Re: [MacPorts] #38906: Error: Processing of port keepassx failed
by MacPorts 07 Oct '15

07 Oct '15

#38906: Error: Processing of port keepassx failed ------------------------+-------------------------------- Reporter: gaga335@… | Owner: macports-tickets@… Type: defect | Status: reopened Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: 2.1.3 Resolution: | Keywords: Port: KeePassX | ------------------------+-------------------------------- Comment (by davide.liessi@…): Replying to [comment:17 eborisch@…]: > and then attach the file located at {{{`port dir keepassx`/work/build/CMakeFiles/CMakeError.log}}} so we can try to identify the underlying issue? Done. > Does building with configure.compiler=macports-clang-3.7 work? I won't try with clang-3.7 since I don't have it installed and I don't want to spend several hours building it. I can try with clang-3.4 though. -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/38906#comment:18> MacPorts <https://www.macports.org/> Ports system for OS X

1 0

[MacPorts] #49139: proxytunnel @1.9.0: build error: Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64 in ntlm.o for El Capitan
by MacPorts 07 Oct '15

07 Oct '15

#49139: proxytunnel @1.9.0: build error: Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64 in ntlm.o for El Capitan -----------------------+-------------------------------- Reporter: steele@… | Owner: macports-tickets@… Type: defect | Status: new Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: 2.3.4 Keywords: elcapitan | Port: proxytunnel -----------------------+-------------------------------- proxytunnel 1.9.0 build failed, main.log attached. -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/49139> MacPorts <https://www.macports.org/> Ports system for OS X

1 3

[MacPorts] #49130: Unable to build UHD on a GQRX install.
by MacPorts 07 Oct '15

07 Oct '15

#49130: Unable to build UHD on a GQRX install. ------------------------------+-------------------------------- Reporter: primalbuddhist@… | Owner: macports-tickets@… Type: defect | Status: new Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: 2.3.4 Keywords: UHD build | Port: ------------------------------+-------------------------------- I am using OSX 10.6.8 / with Xcode 3.2.6 / have installed Macports 2.3.4 / and attempted to install GQRX for an RTL-SDR .... and can't seem to get past the / build UHD (fail) / -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/49130> MacPorts <https://www.macports.org/> Ports system for OS X

1 1

[MacPorts] #49118: uhd build fail in a Gqrx install
by MacPorts 07 Oct '15

07 Oct '15

#49118: uhd build fail in a Gqrx install ------------------------------+-------------------------------- Reporter: primalbuddhist@… | Owner: macports-tickets@… Type: defect | Status: new Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: 2.3.4 Keywords: uhd build | Port: gqrx ------------------------------+-------------------------------- 36 hours in.. made it past a libgcc build fail... but can't get past this uhd build fail... i know i have a DNS server warning... i have done a /clean uhd/ and a /clean --dist uhd/ a few times with computer restarts.. no luck.. not sure how to proceed.. I'm not really computer savvy, but am wading through the lingo, do dads, and hickee jiggerz ... Trying to get my Rtl Sdr usb stick up and running with GQRX ... imagine a kid, about 10 years old, on Christmas morning; he's sitting in front of a mound of unopened presents.... but he can't open them until he learns Algebra and Calculus.. That's about how i feel right now.. Any help is greatly appreciated... Thanks in advance.. -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/49118> MacPorts <https://www.macports.org/> Ports system for OS X

1 1

[MacPorts] #49040: Yubico-pam needs to be updated for El Capitan's new filesystem restrictions
by MacPorts 06 Oct '15

06 Oct '15

#49040: Yubico-pam needs to be updated for El Capitan's new filesystem restrictions ---------------------------------+-------------------------------- Reporter: pkutzner+macports@… | Owner: macports-tickets@… Type: defect | Status: new Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: 2.3.3 Keywords: | Port: yubico-pam ---------------------------------+-------------------------------- OSX 10.11 (El Capitan) now denies write access to /System, /bin, /usr, and /sbin even to the root user, however /usr/local/* can still be written to by root. Currently yubico-pam is set to be configured to install to /usr/lib/pam. The configuration file needs to be changed so that '--with- pam-dir' in the configure.args section points to /usr/local/lib/pam instead of /usr/lib/pam. Change: configure.args --with-pam-dir=/usr/lib/pam \ To: configure.args --with-pam-dir=/usr/local/lib/pam \ -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/49040> MacPorts <https://www.macports.org/> Ports system for OS X

1 3

Re: [MacPorts] #44193: qt: allow side by side installation of qt4-mac and qt5-mac
by MacPorts 06 Oct '15

06 Oct '15

#44193: qt: allow side by side installation of qt4-mac and qt5-mac -------------------------------+------------------------ Reporter: mojca@… | Owner: mcalhoun@… Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: Resolution: | Keywords: Port: qt4-mac, qt5-mac | -------------------------------+------------------------ Comment (by rjvbertin@…): Replying to [comment:77 michaelld@…]: > Committed in r140960. Now the real work begins, of fixing ports that aren't working with this install location. A bit late: {{{ > man porthier }}} -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/44193#comment:80> MacPorts <https://www.macports.org/> Ports system for OS X

1 0

Re: [MacPorts] #44193: qt: allow side by side installation of qt4-mac and qt5-mac
by MacPorts 06 Oct '15

06 Oct '15

#44193: qt: allow side by side installation of qt4-mac and qt5-mac -------------------------------+------------------------ Reporter: mojca@… | Owner: mcalhoun@… Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: Resolution: | Keywords: Port: qt4-mac, qt5-mac | -------------------------------+------------------------ Comment (by rjvbertin@…): Replying to [comment:78 michaelld@…]: > So, I'm not convinced that that change is necessary for Mac OS X. It might be for Linux or BSD; I don't know. "That" change being {{{ pre-configure { configure.env-append MAKEFLAGS=-j${build.jobs} } }}} is ONLY > to build qmake in parallel as should be evident from the code. -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/44193#comment:79> MacPorts <https://www.macports.org/> Ports system for OS X

1 0

Re: [MacPorts] #44193: qt: allow side by side installation of qt4-mac and qt5-mac
by MacPorts 06 Oct '15

06 Oct '15

#44193: qt: allow side by side installation of qt4-mac and qt5-mac -------------------------------+------------------------ Reporter: mojca@… | Owner: mcalhoun@… Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: Resolution: | Keywords: Port: qt4-mac, qt5-mac | -------------------------------+------------------------ Comment (by michaelld@…): I'm updating my local install of qt4-mac, and even without setting MAKEFLAGS all of the CPUs are totally loaded down. I'm guessing that 'port' is using -j4 because my computer has 4 real CPUs and 4 virtual ones (via hyperthreading). So, I'm not convinced that that change is necessary for Mac OS X. It might be for Linux or BSD; I don't know. -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/44193#comment:78> MacPorts <https://www.macports.org/> Ports system for OS X

1 0

Re: [MacPorts] #44193: qt: allow side by side installation of qt4-mac and qt5-mac
by MacPorts 06 Oct '15

06 Oct '15

#44193: qt: allow side by side installation of qt4-mac and qt5-mac -------------------------------+------------------------ Reporter: mojca@… | Owner: mcalhoun@… Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: Resolution: | Keywords: Port: qt4-mac, qt5-mac | -------------------------------+------------------------ Comment (by michaelld@…): Committed in r140960. Now the real work begins, of fixing ports that aren't working with this install location. Fun times ahead! -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/44193#comment:77> MacPorts <https://www.macports.org/> Ports system for OS X

1 0