#41600: bison: update to 3.0.2 ------------------------------+---------------------- Reporter: akim.demaille@… | Owner: larryv@… Type: update | Status: assigned Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: Resolution: | Keywords: haspatch Port: bison | ------------------------------+---------------------- Comment (by larryv@…): The [http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/bison.git/tree/PACKAGING?id=v3.0.4 PACKAGING] file suggests distributing Bison as two separate packages, but that file hasn’t changed much during its [http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/bison.git/log/PACKAGING decade of existence], and my cursory examination of [https://www.archlinux.org/packages/core/x86_64/bison/files/ Arch’s] and [https://packages.debian.org/wheezy/amd64/bison/filelist Debian’s] packaging suggests that other distributions tend to disregard it. Does upstream (i.e., you) care about this? It would be easy enough to split the port, but I don’t want to do so if PACKAGING is no longer relevant. -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/41600#comment:26> MacPorts <https://www.macports.org/> Ports system for OS X