#44777: p5-xml-twig @3.39 update to 3.48 (+add p5.18, p5.20, +formating) -------------------------------+------------------------------- Reporter: Joel.Brogniart@… | Owner: frank.mcpherson@… Type: update | Status: new Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: Resolution: | Keywords: haspatch Port: p5-xml-twig | -------------------------------+------------------------------- Comment (by Joel.Brogniart@…): Replying to [comment:4 larryv@…]:
Two patches in one ticket is fine. Please generate them such that the functional patch is applied //last//; this keeps `svn blame` useful.
Is there a rule for Portfile file names in such a case. For one patch, I use Portfile.orig and Portfile to calculate the diff. But with chained patches do I use the same names again or could I use something like Portfile.orig, Portfile.1, …, Portfile? -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/44777#comment:5> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for OS X