#37334: NEW: py-obspy @0.8.3 ------------------------------+-------------------------- Reporter: Peter.Danecek@… | Owner: ryandesign@… Type: submission | Status: assigned Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: Resolution: | Keywords: Port: py-obspy | ------------------------------+-------------------------- Comment (by Peter.Danecek@…): Replying to [comment:7 jmr@…]:
You shouldn't need the deactivate hack if the other port is replaced_by this one. source:tags/release_2_1_2/base/src/registry2.0/portimage.tcl#L461
Sorry, I am not sure if I am getting this right. Is this a new feature of the base system (version 2.1.2)? I understood that the hack would be necessary to correctly replace the former port, see also comment:2. But maybe I did the testing against the earlier version? -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/37334#comment:8> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for Mac OS