#43009: [update] net-snmp 5.7.2.1 + improvements ------------------------+-------------------------- Reporter: jul_bsd@… | Owner: ryandesign@… Type: update | Status: new Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: Resolution: | Keywords: haspatch Port: net-snmp | ------------------------+-------------------------- Comment (by jul_bsd@…): No problem. I choose to put sane/secure default on installation to avoid exposing unnecessary stuff. After, it depends a lot on what is the user input on snmpconf As also an OpenBSD user, I think it's better if system/package can by default offer secure/sane default and it's up to user to adjust is need but if he does not, he shouldn't be to threatened. Maybe, we can reinforce the notes with text like "To open snmpd, just edit /path/to/plist and remove 127.0.0.1. You are advise to use snmp V3 for authentication and read-only configuration unless necessary eg $ snmpwalk -v3 -On -u <user> -l AuthPriv -a SHA -A <auth_password> -X <encryption_password> <HOST_IP> system " -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/43009#comment:9> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for OS X