Re: [MacPorts] #32395: gst-plugins-gl 0.10.2 i386 build fail w/ possible solution

4 Dec 2011

      #32395: gst-plugins-gl 0.10.2 i386 build fail w/ possible solution
--------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
  Reporter:  reid@…                   |       Owner:  macports-tickets@…                   
      Type:  defect                   |      Status:  closed                               
  Priority:  Normal                   |   Milestone:                                       
 Component:  ports                    |     Version:  2.0.3                                
Resolution:  duplicate                |    Keywords:                                       
      Port:  gst-plugins-gl           |  
--------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Changes (by ryandesign@…):

 * cc: ryandesign@…, rmstonecipher@… (added)
  * status:  new => closed
  * resolution:  => duplicate
  * port:  => gst-plugins-gl

Old description:
...
It was gstglwindow_cocoa.m -> libgstgl_0.10_la-gstglwindow_cocoa.o
(x86_64) that was causing problems.  Adding this did I think:

...
if { $build_arch == "i386" } {
        #configure.env-append "GST_CFLAGS=-arch ${build_arch}"
        configure.cflags-append "-arch ${build_arch}"
        configure.cppflags-append "-arch ${build_arch}"
        configure.cxxflags-append "-arch ${build_arch}"
}
New description:

 It was gstglwindow_cocoa.m -> libgstgl_0.10_la-gstglwindow_cocoa.o
 (x86_64) that was causing problems.  Adding this did I think:

 {{{
 if { $build_arch == "i386" } {
         #configure.env-append "GST_CFLAGS=-arch ${build_arch}"
         configure.cflags-append "-arch ${build_arch}"
         configure.cppflags-append "-arch ${build_arch}"
         configure.cxxflags-append "-arch ${build_arch}"
 }
 }}}

--

Comment:

 Please use WikiFormatting, fill in the Port field, and Cc the maintainer
 of that port.

 This "solution" seems strange. Why would adding the `-arch` flag only be
 needed for i386? Why not for the three other archs we support? MacPorts
 already adds `-arch` flags to CFLAGS, CXXFLAGS, LDFLAGS for you, for all
 archs, and they shouldn't be necessary in CPPFLAGS.

 This looks like a duplicate of #27898.

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/32395#comment:1>
MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/>
Ports system for Mac OS