#46411: p5-mac-carbon: should we retire ports depending on Carbon? -------------------------------------------------+------------------------- Reporter: mojca@… | Owner: macports- Type: defect | tickets@… Priority: Normal | Status: new Component: ports | Milestone: Resolution: | Version: Port: p5-mac-appleevents-simple p5-mac- | Keywords: apps-launch p5-mac-carbon p5-mac-glue p5-mac- | growl p5-mac-osa-simple | -------------------------------------------------+------------------------- Comment (by devans@…): pixilla has dropped maintainership of `p5-mac-growl` in r131395, so I guess that makes 4-0 for dropping `p5-mac-carbon` and dependents. Looking at the documentation for p5-macosx-file {{{ As of Mac OS X v10.4 (Tiger), most of these operations with resource fork are supported by the ordinary (cp|mv|rsync). If you are looking for psync, you may as well consider using rsync -E instead. }}} Based on this and its 32 bit nature, I would nuke this one too except that PsyncX, maintained by ryandesign depends on it. Are you still using this, Ryan? -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/46411#comment:12> MacPorts <https://www.macports.org/> Ports system for OS X