#45185: lv2 @1.10.0, lilv @0.20.0, serd @0.20.0, sord @0.12.2, sratom @0.4.6: new ports ------------------------------------------------+-------------------------- Reporter: aggraef@… | Owner: macports- Type: submission | tickets@… Priority: Normal | Status: new Component: ports | Milestone: Resolution: | Version: 2.3.1 Port: lv2core lv2 lilv serd sord sratom | Keywords: haspatch ------------------------------------------------+-------------------------- Comment (by aggraef@…): Yes, exactly, the ports provided here are the latest releases by Dave Robillard (lv2 supersedes lv2core, lilv supersedes slv2) and are required by all newer LV2 applications. We should probably keep slv2 for legacy LV2 hosts which still need it, however. The only problem with that is that lv2core (dependency of slv2) and lv2 (dependency of lilv) conflict (they install mostly the same files in the same locations). The way this is resolved in Linux distributions like Ubuntu is that they make the old lv2core just a dummy package which pulls in the new lv2 instead. (slv2 should probably work fine with lv2 in lieu of lv2core, but I haven't tried that yet.) If that doesn't seem feasible, then IMHO we should just keep both sets of ports and have the programmer decide whether he needs/wants one or the other. -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/45185#comment:2> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for OS X