#16131: kde4.1 Portfiles -------------------------------+-------------------------------------------- Reporter: iggy@theiggy.com | Owner: macports-tickets@lists.macosforge.org Type: defect | Status: new Priority: Normal | Milestone: Port Submissions Component: ports | Version: 1.6.0 Resolution: | Keywords: kde strigi -------------------------------+-------------------------------------------- Comment (by raimue@macports.org): Unified diffs would be preferred for updates of existing ports, as they are easier to review. Your tarball seems to contain some unrelated ports (dbus, xine-lib). Or I just can't figure out why you included them. Maybe you should file separate tickets to upgrade them and CC their maintainers. I don't understand what fix-links.sh is for. Shouldn't that be done in the Portfile itself? In some Portfiles is a list of commented out dependencies below the depends_* lines. What's up with them? Are they necessary or not? There are no releases of phonon and automoc yet? Those KDE developers really depend on unreleased software? That sounds crazy and bad... There is a shorthand `use_bzip2 yes`, you don't need to override `distfiles` yourself. If a port does not have a maintainer, use `nomaintainer`. -- Ticket URL: <http://trac.macports.org/ticket/16131#comment:3> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for Mac OS