#16933: RFE: Make Python 2.6 more Framework Friendly ------------------------------------+--------------------------------------- Reporter: mcalhoun@macports.org | Owner: blb@macports.org Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: Normal | Milestone: Port Enhancements Component: ports | Version: 1.6.0 Resolution: | Keywords: Port: python26 | ------------------------------------+--------------------------------------- Comment(by mcalhoun@macports.org): Thanks for the reply.
* Why is libpython${branch}.dylib removed? The only reason is that if another port is using the python framework installation correctly then it is not needed.
* What happens to ${destroot}${prefix}/bin? It should only contain binaries with the branch suffix. With this configuration, only versioned binary files are installed into ${destroot}${prefix}/bin.[[BR]] The python installation does this automatically.[[BR]] Non versioned binaries are located in ${frameworks_dir}/Python.framework/Versions/2.6/bin, which do not conflict with anything.
* Why did you remove --disable-tk? Doesn't that pull in a `depends_lib port:tk`? --disable-tk is not recognized by the python configure script.[[BR]] Further, I can find no mention of tk.[[BR]] I believe this is an artifact from earlier python versions.
* Not sure about the --without-readline flag, but usually readline was provided as a separate port py*-readline until now. Is this going to conflict now? --without-readline is not recognized by the python configure script.[[BR]] The configure does in fact check for how to link readline, but I can find no way of turning it off.[[BR]] There does not seem to be a problem (perhaps because one of the patchfiles includes readline in the disabled_module_list).
-- Ticket URL: <http://trac.macports.org/ticket/16933#comment:6> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for Mac OS