#51825: mitmproxy @0.17.1 -- New port ---------------------------+-------------------- Reporter: gavin@… | Owner: petr@… Type: submission | Status: new Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: 2.3.4 Resolution: | Keywords: Port: py-mitmproxy | ---------------------------+-------------------- Comment (by gavin@…): Maybe the firewall additions could be included as a variant? Replying to [comment:6 petr@…]:
You might already have noted that I upgraded py-mitmproxy. See ticket #51562 for more details.
The Portfile provided with this ticket proposes some firewall settings in the activation/deactivation phase. Is this something we want to adopt for the py-mitproxy port? Or do we prefer that users make such settings consciously/manually?
-- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/51825#comment:8> MacPorts <https://www.macports.org/> Ports system for OS X