[MacPorts] #25175: protobuf-python, protobuf-python25, protobuf-python26: noarch
#25175: protobuf-python, protobuf-python25, protobuf-python26: noarch -------------------------------------+-------------------------------------- Reporter: ryandesign@… | Owner: blair@… Type: defect | Status: new Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: 1.8.99 Keywords: | Port: protobuf-python, protobuf-python25, protobuf-python26 -------------------------------------+-------------------------------------- protobuf-python, protobuf-python25, protobuf-python26 should be marked as noarch, which will also (now that MacPorts 1.9.0 is out) fix the problem that protobuf-python26 has a universal variant. -- Ticket URL: <http://trac.macports.org/ticket/25175> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for Mac OS
#25175: protobuf-python, protobuf-python25, protobuf-python26: noarch -------------------------------------+-------------------------------------- Reporter: ryandesign@… | Owner: blair@… Type: defect | Status: new Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: 1.8.99 Keywords: | Port: protobuf-python, protobuf-python25, protobuf-python26 -------------------------------------+-------------------------------------- Comment(by blair@…): Do I need to bump the revision? -- Ticket URL: <http://trac.macports.org/ticket/25175#comment:1> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for Mac OS
#25175: protobuf-python, protobuf-python25, protobuf-python26: noarch -------------------------------------+-------------------------------------- Reporter: ryandesign@… | Owner: blair@… Type: defect | Status: new Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: 1.8.99 Keywords: | Port: protobuf-python, protobuf-python25, protobuf-python26 -------------------------------------+-------------------------------------- Comment(by ryandesign@…): Probably not necessary. -- Ticket URL: <http://trac.macports.org/ticket/25175#comment:2> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for Mac OS
#25175: protobuf-python, protobuf-python25, protobuf-python26: noarch -------------------------------------+-------------------------------------- Reporter: ryandesign@… | Owner: blair@… Type: defect | Status: assigned Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: 1.8.99 Keywords: | Port: protobuf-python, protobuf-python25, protobuf-python26 -------------------------------------+-------------------------------------- Changes (by blair@…): * status: new => assigned Comment: I see the autoconf Port has this: {{{ if {[info exists supported_archs]} { supported_archs noarch } else { universal_variant no } }}} Do I need all of this or just the "supported_archs noarch" now that MacPorts 1.9.0 is out? -- Ticket URL: <http://trac.macports.org/ticket/25175#comment:3> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for Mac OS
#25175: protobuf-python, protobuf-python25, protobuf-python26: noarch -------------------------------------+-------------------------------------- Reporter: ryandesign@… | Owner: blair@… Type: defect | Status: assigned Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: 1.8.99 Keywords: | Port: protobuf-python, protobuf-python25, protobuf-python26 -------------------------------------+-------------------------------------- Comment(by ryandesign@…): Only "`supported_archs noarch`" is needed with 1.9.0. But we might wait a couple weeks before removing the workarounds from ports, to give people time to upgrade to 1.9.0. -- Ticket URL: <http://trac.macports.org/ticket/25175#comment:4> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for Mac OS
#25175: protobuf-python, protobuf-python25, protobuf-python26: noarch -------------------------------------+-------------------------------------- Reporter: ryandesign@… | Owner: blair@… Type: defect | Status: assigned Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: 1.8.99 Keywords: | Port: protobuf-python, protobuf-python25, protobuf-python26 -------------------------------------+-------------------------------------- Comment(by blair@…): So you're suggesting for now to use the syntax that autoconf uses? -- Ticket URL: <http://trac.macports.org/ticket/25175#comment:5> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for Mac OS
#25175: protobuf-python, protobuf-python25, protobuf-python26: noarch -------------------------------------+-------------------------------------- Reporter: ryandesign@… | Owner: blair@… Type: defect | Status: assigned Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: 1.8.99 Keywords: | Port: protobuf-python, protobuf-python25, protobuf-python26 -------------------------------------+-------------------------------------- Comment(by ryandesign@…): Yes, it might prevent a few tickets from being filed by users who haven't realized 1.9.0 is available yet. In a couple weeks we can make a sweep through all ports to remove these bits. -- Ticket URL: <http://trac.macports.org/ticket/25175#comment:6> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for Mac OS
#25175: protobuf-python, protobuf-python25, protobuf-python26: noarch --------------------------------------------------------------------+------- Reporter: ryandesign@… | Owner: blair@… Type: defect | Status: closed Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: 1.8.99 Resolution: fixed | Keywords: Port: protobuf-python, protobuf-python25, protobuf-python26 | --------------------------------------------------------------------+------- Changes (by blair@…): * status: assigned => closed * resolution: => fixed Comment: Thanks, fixed in r68666. BTW, supported_archs isn't documented in man portfile. Should I open a ticket? -- Ticket URL: <http://trac.macports.org/ticket/25175#comment:7> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for Mac OS
#25175: protobuf-python, protobuf-python25, protobuf-python26: noarch --------------------------------------------------------------------+------- Reporter: ryandesign@… | Owner: blair@… Type: defect | Status: closed Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: 1.8.99 Resolution: fixed | Keywords: Port: protobuf-python, protobuf-python25, protobuf-python26 | --------------------------------------------------------------------+------- Comment(by ryandesign@…): There are a great many things missing and outdated in the portfile manpage, it seems, but yes, please file a ticket. -- Ticket URL: <http://trac.macports.org/ticket/25175#comment:8> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for Mac OS
participants (1)
-
MacPorts