#48905: New port: syncthing ----------------------------+-------------------------------- Reporter: link.dupont@… | Owner: macports-tickets@… Type: submission | Status: new Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: 2.3.3 Resolution: | Keywords: Port: syncthing | ----------------------------+-------------------------------- Comment (by anatol.pomozov@…): Ping? Syncthing is a great tool and I use it daily. Would love to see an official port. -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/48905#comment:2> MacPorts <https://www.macports.org/> Ports system for OS X

#48905: New port: syncthing ----------------------------+-------------------------------- Reporter: link.dupont@… | Owner: macports-tickets@… Type: submission | Status: new Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: 2.3.3 Resolution: | Keywords: Port: syncthing | ----------------------------+-------------------------------- Comment (by mf2k@…): Sorry for the delay. Some notes/questions: - link.dupont: Are you still interested in being maintainer? Can we add openmaintainer? - The {{{revision}}} line should be deleted because 0 is the default value. - In the {{{notes}}} block, {{{/opt/local/}}} should be replaced with {{{${prefix}}}}. -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/48905#comment:5> MacPorts <https://www.macports.org/> Ports system for OS X

#48905: New port: syncthing ----------------------------+-------------------------------- Reporter: link.dupont@… | Owner: macports-tickets@… Type: submission | Status: new Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: 2.3.3 Resolution: | Keywords: Port: syncthing | ----------------------------+-------------------------------- Comment (by mf2k@…): That is definitely not expected. If that can be figured out, maybe by looking at other ports, I will commit it. We can make you maintainer if you are interested? link.dupont is not responding. -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/48905#comment:7> MacPorts <https://www.macports.org/> Ports system for OS X

#48905: New port: syncthing ----------------------------+-------------------------------- Reporter: link.dupont@… | Owner: macports-tickets@… Type: submission | Status: new Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: 2.3.3 Resolution: | Keywords: Port: syncthing | ----------------------------+-------------------------------- Comment (by raimue@…): `notes` takes a normal Tcl string argument. With `{}` no variable substitution is applied, use `""` instead. -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/48905#comment:9> MacPorts <https://www.macports.org/> Ports system for OS X

#48905: New port: syncthing ----------------------------+-------------------------------- Reporter: link.dupont@… | Owner: macports-tickets@… Type: submission | Status: new Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: 2.3.3 Resolution: | Keywords: Port: syncthing | ----------------------------+-------------------------------- Comment (by mf2k@…): More notes: - Due to the custom build phase, the universal variant will need to be removed or handled explicitly. - Are you OK with being maintainer? -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/48905#comment:12> MacPorts <https://www.macports.org/> Ports system for macOS

#48905: New port: syncthing ----------------------------+-------------------------------- Reporter: link.dupont@… | Owner: macports-tickets@… Type: submission | Status: new Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: 2.3.3 Resolution: | Keywords: Port: syncthing | ----------------------------+-------------------------------- Comment (by leonardo.schenkel@…): Hi, I submitted a new Portfile in #52324. My bad, I did not notice that there was already a submission open and did not mean to hijack this ticket. I volunteer to be the maintainer this port, in case there are no other interested. The version I submitted is not very different from the one here, but I believe mine is a bit more compliant with the MacPorts file hierarchy standard. I also plan to add subports later for the other servers (discovery server, relay server, etc.). In case my Portfile is taken for consideration, I would like some feedback and guidance regarding the decision on how to handle versioning because Syncthing regularly releases new versions which are not backwards- compatible and break the synchronization protocol. More details in #52324. -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/48905#comment:14> MacPorts <https://www.macports.org/> Ports system for macOS

#48905: New port: syncthing ----------------------------+-------------------------------- Reporter: link.dupont@… | Owner: macports-tickets@… Type: submission | Status: closed Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: Resolution: duplicate | Keywords: Port: syncthing | ----------------------------+-------------------------------- Changes (by mf2k@…): * status: new => closed * version: 2.3.3 => * resolution: => duplicate -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/48905#comment:18> MacPorts <https://www.macports.org/> Ports system for the Mac operating system