[MacPorts] #21545: ghostscript is unversal available but Portfile do not checked
#21545: ghostscript is unversal available but Portfile do not checked ------------------------------+--------------------------------------------- Reporter: ToePeu@… | Owner: macports-tickets@… Type: defect | Status: new Priority: Low | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: 1.8.0 Keywords: universal | Port: ghostscript ------------------------------+--------------------------------------------- you can support universal ghostscript just change Portfile 'no' to 'yes' -- Ticket URL: <http://trac.macports.org/ticket/21545> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for Mac OS
#21545: ghostscript is unversal available but Portfile do not checked ------------------------------+--------------------------------------------- Reporter: ToePeu@… | Owner: takanori@… Type: defect | Status: new Priority: Low | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: 1.8.0 Keywords: universal | Port: ghostscript ------------------------------+--------------------------------------------- Changes (by jmr@…): * owner: macports-tickets@… => takanori@… -- Ticket URL: <http://trac.macports.org/ticket/21545#comment:1> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for Mac OS
#21545: ghostscript is unversal available but Portfile do not checked ------------------------------+--------------------------------------------- Reporter: ToePeu@… | Owner: takanori@… Type: defect | Status: new Priority: Low | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: 1.8.0 Keywords: universal | Port: ghostscript ------------------------------+--------------------------------------------- Comment(by jmr@…): The universal variant was disabled because it was reported to not work properly, see #15437. -- Ticket URL: <http://trac.macports.org/ticket/21545#comment:2> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for Mac OS
#21545: ghostscript is unversal available but Portfile do not checked ------------------------------+--------------------------------------------- Reporter: ToePeu@… | Owner: takanori@… Type: defect | Status: new Priority: Low | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: 1.8.0 Keywords: universal | Port: ghostscript ------------------------------+--------------------------------------------- Comment(by ToePeu@…): Replying to [comment:2 jmr@…]:
The universal variant was disabled because it was reported to not work properly, see #15437.
it do not work really? i am really sorry but it is obviously bug for me that universal variable is not checked. my machine is 64bit-based one. but i set macport to i386, because many source code make error while 64bit-compiling. when build ghost-script, i do not know why, but dynamic library in sobin directory is built as 64bit-binary only, so i couldn't build i386 ghost script properly. ghost script do not look make error itself when building, so i suggest that # build sobin as proper architecture # or build sobin as universal, still binary is not universal i am sorry about wrong report, sorry. -- Ticket URL: <http://trac.macports.org/ticket/21545#comment:3> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for Mac OS
#21545: ghostscript doesn't support changing build_arch ------------------------------+--------------------------------------------- Reporter: ToePeu@… | Owner: takanori@… Type: defect | Status: new Priority: Low | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: 1.8.0 Keywords: universal | Port: ghostscript ------------------------------+--------------------------------------------- Changes (by ryandesign@…): * cc: ryandesign@… (added) Comment: Replying to [comment:3 ToePeu@…]:
my machine is 64bit-based one. but i set macport to i386, because many source code make error while 64bit-compiling.[[br]] [[br]] when build ghost-script, i do not know why, but dynamic library in sobin directory is built as 64bit-binary only, so i couldn't build i386 ghost script properly.
Ok, so the bug you're reporting is actually that the ghostscript port doesn't respect the build_arch variable. I've adjusted the title of this bug to match that. I've also filed a new bug #24056 requesting a universal variant be added, which is a related but separate issue. -- Ticket URL: <http://trac.macports.org/ticket/21545#comment:4> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for Mac OS
#21545: ghostscript doesn't support changing build_arch ------------------------------+--------------------------------------------- Reporter: ToePeu@… | Owner: takanori@… Type: defect | Status: new Priority: Low | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: 1.8.0 Keywords: universal | Port: ghostscript ------------------------------+--------------------------------------------- Comment(by ryandesign@…): Has duplicate #23783. -- Ticket URL: <http://trac.macports.org/ticket/21545#comment:5> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for Mac OS
#21545: ghostscript doesn't support changing build_arch ------------------------------+--------------------------------------------- Reporter: ToePeu@… | Owner: takanori@… Type: defect | Status: new Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: 1.8.0 Keywords: | Port: ghostscript ------------------------------+--------------------------------------------- Changes (by ryandesign@…): * priority: Low => Normal * keywords: universal => Comment: Has duplicate #24380 which got fixed, and also I believe MacPorts 1.9 fixes this as well, by automatically including the arch flags in the ldflags. -- Ticket URL: <http://trac.macports.org/ticket/21545#comment:6> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for Mac OS
#21545: ghostscript doesn't support changing build_arch -------------------------------+-------------------------------------------- Reporter: ToePeu@… | Owner: takanori@… Type: defect | Status: closed Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: 1.8.0 Resolution: duplicate | Keywords: Port: ghostscript | -------------------------------+-------------------------------------------- Changes (by jmr@…): * status: new => closed * resolution: => duplicate Comment: Yes, #24380 covered the build_arch problem. -- Ticket URL: <http://trac.macports.org/ticket/21545#comment:7> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for Mac OS
participants (1)
-
MacPorts