Re: [MacPorts] #45251: request for lldb
#45251: request for lldb --------------------------+---------------------- Reporter: rjvbertin@… | Owner: larryv@… Type: request | Status: assigned Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: Resolution: | Keywords: Port: lldb | --------------------------+---------------------- Comment (by jeremyhu@…): Some comments: 1. Don't skip codesigning. There's not really a reason that I can see to do patch-no-codesign-3.9.diff. If the developer doesn't have a CODESIGN_IDENTITY set, just adhoc sign it by setting LLDB_CODESIGN_IDENTITY to - when executing cmake. 2. We should probably allow users to specifiy a codesigning identity in macports.conf and honor that. 3. Where is the code-sign-1.0.tcl that you reference in the Portfile changes? 4. We should not rebuild everything for lldb. The cmake build system should be capable of building lldb against the installed llvm and libclang. Can you try that out. There are some reasons why we can't yet do that for clang, but it's a goal to not have to rebuild what's already built. 5. We should not need to use `install_name_tool` to change the dylib identifiers. 6. Why patch-accept-build_types.diff? What's being passed that isn't accepted? Should you instead update that list and push the patch upstream? -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/45251#comment:20> MacPorts <https://www.macports.org/> Ports system for macOS
participants (1)
-
MacPorts