#35863: varnish update to 3.0.3 -------------------------------------+-------------------------------------- Reporter: robsonpeixoto@… | Owner: pmq@… Type: update | Status: new Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: 2.1.2 Keywords: haspatch | Port: varnish -------------------------------------+-------------------------------------- Changes (by ryandesign@…): * owner: macports-tickets@… => pmq@… * cc: ryandesign@… (removed) Comment: Please attach a patch that has functional changes or whitespace changes but not both. -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/35863#comment:1> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for Mac OS

#35863: varnish update to 3.0.3 ------------------------------+---------------------- Reporter: robsonpeixoto@… | Owner: pmq@… Type: update | Status: new Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: 2.1.2 Resolution: | Keywords: haspatch Port: varnish | ------------------------------+---------------------- Comment (by robsonpeixoto@…): Replying to [comment:2 ryandesign@…]:

I updated varnish to 3.0.3 in r97982. I did not change the epoch line because there's no reason to do so when the version increases normally. The only reason to increase the epoch is if the version decreases.

Thanks =D

What do we need to do with the other patches you've attached here? If

you want something else committed, please attach a diff with only functional changes (not mixed with whitespace changes). The patch 'startupitem_livecheck.patch' add startupitem, a reload script and livecheck. -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/35863#comment:3> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for Mac OS

#35863: varnish update to 3.0.3 ------------------------------+---------------------- Reporter: robsonpeixoto@… | Owner: pmq@… Type: update | Status: new Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: 2.1.2 Resolution: | Keywords: haspatch Port: varnish | ------------------------------+---------------------- Comment (by ryandesign@…): The problem with the last patch you attached is that it mixes whitespace and functional changes, and the whitespace appears to have indents at multiples of two spaces, but MacPorts' preferred whitespace style is to have indents at multiples of four spaces. Could you attach a patch with functional changes only, that leaves the port's whitespace style as it is? We should leave whitespace changes to the discretion of the port maintainer for now. -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/35863#comment:5> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for Mac OS

#35863: varnish update to 3.0.3 ------------------------------+---------------------- Reporter: robsonpeixoto@… | Owner: normen@… Type: update | Status: new Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: Resolution: | Keywords: haspatch Port: varnish | ------------------------------+---------------------- Changes (by mf2k@…): * owner: pmq@… => normen@… * version: 2.1.2 => Comment: Assigning to new maintainer. -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/35863#comment:7> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for OS X