#14305: Making gtk2 +quartz depend on pango +no_x11 ------------------------------------------+--------------------------------- Reporter: shreevatsa.public@gmail.com | Owner: nox@macports.org Type: defect | Status: new Priority: Normal | Milestone: Port Bugs Component: ports | Version: 1.6.0 Resolution: | Keywords: gtk2 pango cairo x11 quartz ------------------------------------------+--------------------------------- Changes (by raimue@macports.org): * owner: macports-tickets@lists.macosforge.org => nox@macports.org -- Ticket URL: <http://trac.macosforge.org/projects/macports/ticket/14305#comment:1> MacPorts </projects/macports> Ports system for Mac OS

#14305: Making gtk2 +quartz depend on pango +no_x11 ------------------------------------------+--------------------------------- Reporter: shreevatsa.public@gmail.com | Owner: nox@macports.org Type: defect | Status: assigned Priority: Normal | Milestone: Port Bugs Component: ports | Version: 1.6.0 Resolution: | Keywords: gtk2 pango cairo x11 quartz ------------------------------------------+--------------------------------- Comment (by shreevatsa.public@gmail.com): Oh right, I should have attached a diff in the first place. Done. Is the format right? -- Ticket URL: <http://trac.macosforge.org/projects/macports/ticket/14305#comment:3> MacPorts </projects/macports> Ports system for Mac OS

#14305: Making gtk2 +quartz depend on pango +no_x11 ------------------------------------------+--------------------------------- Reporter: shreevatsa.public@gmail.com | Owner: nox@macports.org Type: defect | Status: assigned Priority: Normal | Milestone: Port Bugs Component: ports | Version: 1.6.0 Resolution: | Keywords: gtk2 pango cairo x11 quartz ------------------------------------------+--------------------------------- Comment (by shreevatsa.public@gmail.com): Oh, that is the problem, as I mentioned in the opening commentary -- building gtk2 with only +quartz makes it build fine. A gtk2 application can also be successfully built on top of this. Only when the application is started is there a problem -- all text is blank! There are no error messages anwyhere (while building), but there is an error when a program is run (I don't remember the error, but it does not make your program crash, just results in it having no text). -- Ticket URL: <http://trac.macosforge.org/projects/macports/ticket/14305#comment:5> MacPorts </projects/macports> Ports system for Mac OS

#14305: Making gtk2 +quartz depend on pango +no_x11 ------------------------------------------+--------------------------------- Reporter: shreevatsa.public@gmail.com | Owner: nox@macports.org Type: defect | Status: assigned Priority: Normal | Milestone: Port Bugs Component: ports | Version: 1.6.0 Resolution: | Keywords: gtk2 pango cairo x11 quartz ------------------------------------------+--------------------------------- Comment (by reiffert@macports.org): Can we have gtk2 as quartz *and* x11 version in parallel? What would it take to have? -- Ticket URL: <http://trac.macosforge.org/projects/macports/ticket/14305#comment:7> MacPorts </projects/macports> Ports system for Mac OS

#14305: Making gtk2 +quartz depend on pango +no_x11 ------------------------------------------+--------------------------------- Reporter: shreevatsa.public@gmail.com | Owner: nox@macports.org Type: defect | Status: assigned Priority: Normal | Milestone: Port Bugs Component: ports | Version: 1.6.0 Resolution: | Keywords: gtk2 pango cairo x11 quartz ------------------------------------------+--------------------------------- Comment (by shreevatsa.public@gmail.com): Hello, I emailed the developer of the quartz GTK2, and he says: {{{

* pango must be built with --without-x ?

As far as I know, yes. }}} So I reiterate that it is reasonable to make pango build with +no_x11, since that is probably as far as anyone knows :P Also, in answer to the other question: {{{

Finally, is it possible to have gtk2 as both quartz and x11 version in parallel? What would it take?

You will have to use a different prefix, as this is a compile time switch and not runtime. I.e. you would have to use, say, /opt/foo/ and /opt/bar/, with a completely separate installation for each backend, also any software you build against GTK+ will have to be configured and compiled against one or the other. }}} (So basically no, not in the sense you mean.) So could this patch (again.diff) or something equivalent be merged? -- Ticket URL: <http://trac.macosforge.org/projects/macports/ticket/14305#comment:9> MacPorts </projects/macports> Ports system for Mac OS

#14305: Making gtk2 +quartz depend on pango +no_x11 ------------------------------------------+--------------------------------- Reporter: shreevatsa.public@gmail.com | Owner: nox@macports.org Type: defect | Status: assigned Priority: Normal | Milestone: Port Bugs Component: ports | Version: 1.6.0 Resolution: | Keywords: gtk2 pango cairo x11 quartz ------------------------------------------+--------------------------------- Comment (by shreevatsa.public@gmail.com): I know... it would be great. But Richard says it isn't possible. What it would take to have them in parallel is what you have -- /opt/x11/local and /opt/quartz/local. Of course, it might be possible to have them both "inside" the same macports tree, say /opt/local/gtk-x11 and /opt/local /gtk-quartz, and /opt/local/lib/gtk-2.0 symlinked to one of them, and every application that uses gtk could be explicitly asked to use one gtk or the other. In the meantime -- commit this thing, so that I don't have to lose my custom Portfile if I upgrade :P -- Ticket URL: <http://trac.macosforge.org/projects/macports/ticket/14305#comment:11> MacPorts </projects/macports> Ports system for Mac OS