[MacPorts] #26890: texlive-fonts-recommended @13822_1+doc : Missing map entries
#26890: texlive-fonts-recommended @13822_1+doc : Missing map entries --------------------------------+------------------------------------------- Reporter: etphipp@… | Owner: macports-tickets@… Type: defect | Status: new Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: 1.9.1 Keywords: texlive | Port: texlive-fonts-recommended --------------------------------+------------------------------------------- While trying to use the palatino fonts from texlive-fonts-recommended, I discovered that the corresponding map entry (upl.map) in /opt/local/etc/texmf/updmap.d/10texlive-fonts-recommended.cfg is missing. This causes pdftex or dvips to fail if these fonts are used with an error along the lines of: {{{ kpathsea: Running mktexpk --mfmode ljfour --bdpi 8000 --mag 1+4800/(2*4000) --dpi 12800 uplb8r mktexpk: don't know how to create bitmap font for uplb8r. }}} Adding "Map upl.map" to this file, running "sudo /opt/local/libexec /texlive-update-cnf updmap.cfg" followed by "sudo updmap-sys" fixed the problem. I assume this file is generated from the contents of the Portfile, and it could be fixed by adding the corresponding line there? Looking at the contents of this port, it appears there may be many more map entries missing, although I haven't tried to use those fonts. -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/26890> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for Mac OS
#26890: texlive-fonts-recommended @13822_1+doc : Missing map entries --------------------------------+------------------------------------------- Reporter: etphipp@… | Owner: dports@… Type: defect | Status: new Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: 1.9.1 Keywords: texlive | Port: texlive-fonts-recommended --------------------------------+------------------------------------------- Changes (by jmr@…): * owner: macports-tickets@… => dports@… Comment: Please remember to cc the maintainer. -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/26890#comment:1> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for Mac OS
#26890: texlive-fonts-recommended @13822_1+doc : Missing map entries --------------------------------+------------------------------------------- Reporter: etphipp@… | Owner: dports@… Type: defect | Status: assigned Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: 1.9.1 Keywords: texlive | Port: texlive-fonts-recommended --------------------------------+------------------------------------------- Changes (by dports@…): * status: new => assigned Comment: It does look like something is missing. You're right that the updmap.d file is generated from the portfile. The portfile is generated from the contents of the texlive package database, so this would seem to be an upstream issue. I'd be surprised if they'd simply forgotten some Map lines, so I wonder if we're missing something here... -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/26890#comment:2> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for Mac OS
#26890: texlive-fonts-recommended @13822_1+doc : Missing map entries --------------------------------+------------------------------------------- Reporter: etphipp@… | Owner: dports@… Type: defect | Status: assigned Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: 1.9.1 Keywords: texlive | Port: texlive-fonts-recommended --------------------------------+------------------------------------------- Comment(by etphipp@…): I just tried installing Texlive 2010 from Mac Tex on a different machine and had the same issue, so I agree that is likely an upstream issue. -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/26890#comment:3> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for Mac OS
#26890: texlive-fonts-recommended @13822_1+doc : Missing map entries --------------------------------+------------------------------------------- Reporter: etphipp@… | Owner: dports@… Type: defect | Status: assigned Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: 1.9.1 Keywords: texlive | Port: texlive-fonts-recommended --------------------------------+------------------------------------------- Comment(by jmr@…): Still an issue with 23165? -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/26890#comment:4> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for Mac OS
#26890: texlive-fonts-recommended @13822_1+doc : Missing map entries ----------------------------------------+---------------------- Reporter: etphipp@… | Owner: dports@… Type: defect | Status: assigned Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: 1.9.1 Resolution: | Keywords: texlive Port: texlive-fonts-recommended | ----------------------------------------+---------------------- Comment (by mojca@…): jmr: most probably this is still a problem or at least it hasn't been "fixed" upstream. In order to fix this upstream you would need to request a fix to http://tug.org/svn/texlive/trunk/Master/tlpkg/tlpsrc/palatino.tlpsrc The file should contain a line {{{ execute addMap upl.map }}} The only other duplicate names are in `8r-base.map` which is used by ConTeXt. (I don't know whether this would conflict with ConTeXt, but in case it would I'm sure that the ConTeXt would find a way to avoid the problem.) I have commit rights for upstream, but I don't dare touching it until I get the feedback about whether it is missing by a pure mistake or on purpose. I asked the TeX Live developers about this. Once we get the feedback from TL developers, this can be fixed in MacPorts as well. The important part is to make sure that it won't need extra care when upgrading to TL 2014. -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/26890#comment:6> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for OS X
#26890: texlive-fonts-recommended @13822_1+doc : Missing map entries ----------------------------------------+---------------------- Reporter: etphipp@… | Owner: dports@… Type: defect | Status: assigned Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: 1.9.1 Resolution: | Keywords: texlive Port: texlive-fonts-recommended | ----------------------------------------+---------------------- Comment (by mojca@…): I don't know if Eric is still interested in this issue, but: what source failed to work? Was it a real document or just a test? TL developers were surprised to see the issue because apparently no package tries to load these fonts, so the fonts would have to be loaded manually. The same fonts (with slightly different metrics) apparently come from psnfss and those are usually the ones used by LaTeX packages. -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/26890#comment:7> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for OS X
#26890: texlive-fonts-recommended @13822_1+doc : Missing map entries ----------------------------------------+---------------------- Reporter: etphipp@… | Owner: dports@… Type: defect | Status: assigned Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: 1.9.1 Resolution: | Keywords: texlive Port: texlive-fonts-recommended | ----------------------------------------+---------------------- Comment (by etphipp@…): This was a real document and was triggered by an academic journal style file (I forget which at the moment, probably IJ4UQ or maybe CMAME). This was a while ago though, so it may no longer be relevant. -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/26890#comment:8> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for OS X
#26890: texlive-fonts-recommended @13822_1+doc : Missing map entries ----------------------------------------+---------------------- Reporter: etphipp@… | Owner: dports@… Type: defect | Status: assigned Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: 1.9.1 Resolution: | Keywords: texlive Port: texlive-fonts-recommended | ----------------------------------------+---------------------- Comment (by mojca@…): This is probably not an issue for Elsevier (or at least not any longer) and http://uncertainty-quantification.com/forauthors/ (IJ4UQ) shouldn't trigger this problem either (at least not at the moment). They do use palatino, but if I compile a sample document it takes the fonts that are "properly installed", not the ones listed in `upl.map`. -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/26890#comment:9> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for OS X
#26890: texlive-fonts-recommended @13822_1+doc : Missing map entries ----------------------------------------+---------------------- Reporter: etphipp@… | Owner: dports@… Type: defect | Status: assigned Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: 1.9.1 Resolution: | Keywords: texlive Port: texlive-fonts-recommended | ----------------------------------------+---------------------- Comment (by etphipp@…): It is very likely IJ4UQ fixed their style file (I believe it was a brand new journal when this issue arose), so for at least my usage this isn't relevant anymore. It's not clear to me if it should be fixed anyway. -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/26890#comment:10> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for OS X
#26890: texlive-fonts-recommended @13822_1+doc : Missing map entries ----------------------------------------+---------------------- Reporter: etphipp@… | Owner: dports@… Type: defect | Status: assigned Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: 1.9.1 Resolution: | Keywords: texlive Port: texlive-fonts-recommended | ----------------------------------------+---------------------- Comment (by mojca@…): http://tug.org/svn/texlive?view=revision&revision=31835 -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/26890#comment:11> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for OS X
#26890: texlive-fonts-recommended @13822_1+doc : Missing map entries ----------------------------------------+---------------------- Reporter: etphipp@… | Owner: dports@… Type: defect | Status: assigned Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: 1.9.1 Resolution: | Keywords: texlive Port: texlive-fonts-recommended | ----------------------------------------+---------------------- Comment (by mojca@…): This has been fixed upstream. The only question is: is it worth going through the trouble of enabling it now or would it suffice to simply wait for the upgrade to 2014 (given that the original reporter doesn't need that any longer)? -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/26890#comment:12> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for OS X
#26890: texlive-fonts-recommended @13822_1+doc : Missing map entries ----------------------------------------+---------------------- Reporter: etphipp@… | Owner: dports@… Type: defect | Status: assigned Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: 1.9.1 Resolution: | Keywords: texlive Port: texlive-fonts-recommended | ----------------------------------------+---------------------- Comment (by etphipp@…): I think you can just wait for the upgrade. This is clearly not a burning issue. -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/26890#comment:13> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for OS X
#26890: texlive-fonts-recommended @13822_1+doc : Missing map entries ----------------------------------------+---------------------- Reporter: etphipp@… | Owner: dports@… Type: defect | Status: closed Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: 1.9.1 Resolution: fixed | Keywords: texlive Port: texlive-fonts-recommended | ----------------------------------------+---------------------- Changes (by dports@…): * status: assigned => closed * resolution: => fixed Comment: Normally I'd just leave it for the 2014 update, but since this only touches the map files it's easy enough to apply, and we might as well get it out of the way now... r112132. -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/26890#comment:14> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for OS X
participants (1)
-
MacPorts