[MacPorts] #39813: Suggestion for an upgrade of scotch to 6.0.0
#39813: Suggestion for an upgrade of scotch to 6.0.0 --------------------+-------------------- Reporter: mk@… | Owner: mk@… Type: defect | Status: new Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: 2.1.3 Keywords: | Port: scotch --------------------+-------------------- I tried to upgrade scotch from 5.1.11 to the latest 6.0.0. It builds and installs fine with the attached patch for its portfile. The only problem I've found so far is a failing test, which is documented in issue #39812. I am not going to commit the new portfile unless those who are making use of the 5.1.11 version give me a clear thumbs up. -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/39813> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for OS X
#39813: Suggestion for an upgrade of scotch to 6.0.0 ---------------------+------------------- Reporter: mk@… | Owner: mk@… Type: defect | Status: new Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: 2.1.3 Resolution: | Keywords: Port: scotch | ---------------------+------------------- Comment (by wimmer@…): Scotch 6.0 has a bug that makes is unusable with the MUMPS package (which requires scotch). I was advised to keep to the 5.1.12b version: https://listes.ens-lyon.fr/sympa/arc/mumps-users/2013-02/msg00002.html I'd be thus in favor of not updating. I have almost ready port file for 5.1.12b that I could submit on Monday (Mac only at work, not at home). -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/39813#comment:1> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for OS X
#39813: Suggestion for an upgrade of scotch to 6.0.0 ---------------------+------------------- Reporter: mk@… | Owner: mk@… Type: defect | Status: new Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: 2.1.3 Resolution: | Keywords: Port: scotch | ---------------------+------------------- Comment (by mk@…): OK, I see. Well, at least we have than already the version 6.0.0 ready once it takes off in an updated version together with MUMPS. Good that I didn't update then. :) -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/39813#comment:2> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for OS X
#39813: Suggestion for an upgrade of scotch to 6.0.0 --------------------------+------------------- Reporter: mk@… | Owner: mk@… Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: Low | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: 2.1.3 Resolution: | Keywords: Port: scotch | --------------------------+------------------- Changes (by mk@…): * priority: Normal => Low * type: defect => enhancement -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/39813#comment:3> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for OS X
#39813: Suggestion for an upgrade of scotch to 6.0.0 --------------------------+------------------- Reporter: mk@… | Owner: mk@… Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: Low | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: 2.1.3 Resolution: | Keywords: Port: scotch | --------------------------+------------------- Comment (by mk@…): Alternatively we could introduce scotch 6.0.0 as a new port named scotch6, for those who want to use it. -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/39813#comment:4> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for OS X
#39813: Suggestion for an upgrade of scotch to 6.0.0 --------------------------+------------------- Reporter: mk@… | Owner: mk@… Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: Low | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: 2.1.3 Resolution: | Keywords: Port: scotch | --------------------------+------------------- Comment (by ryandesign@…): Replying to [comment:1 wimmer@…]:
I have almost ready port file for 5.1.12b that I could submit on Monday (Mac only at work, not at home).
This update was submitted in #39890. -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/39813#comment:5> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for OS X
#39813: Suggestion for an upgrade of scotch to 6.0.0 --------------------------+------------------- Reporter: mk@… | Owner: mk@… Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: Low | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: 2.1.3 Resolution: | Keywords: Port: scotch | --------------------------+------------------- Comment (by Peter.Danecek@…): Scotch is now @6.0.0. So I guess this ticket is now irrelevant and could be closed. -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/39813#comment:6> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for OS X
#39813: Suggestion for an upgrade of scotch to 6.0.0 --------------------------+-------------------- Reporter: mk@… | Owner: mk@… Type: enhancement | Status: closed Priority: Low | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: 2.1.3 Resolution: fixed | Keywords: Port: scotch | --------------------------+-------------------- Changes (by sean@…): * status: new => closed * resolution: => fixed -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/39813#comment:7> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for OS X
#39813: Suggestion for an upgrade of scotch to 6.0.0 --------------------------+-------------------- Reporter: mk@… | Owner: mk@… Type: enhancement | Status: closed Priority: Low | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: 2.1.3 Resolution: fixed | Keywords: Port: scotch | --------------------------+-------------------- Comment (by mk@…): Since wimmer didn't complain when the port was upgraded to 6.0.0 in January I think it was fine to close this bug. Because of him I had deliberately not upgraded in August 2013... That's also the reason why I had left this ticket open for so long. -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/39813#comment:8> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for OS X
participants (1)
-
MacPorts