[MacPorts] #19697: double install of texmf
#19697: double install of texmf --------------------------------+------------------------------------------- Reporter: jmcdon10@… | Owner: macports-tickets@… Type: defect | Status: new Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: 1.7.0 Keywords: | Port: --------------------------------+------------------------------------------- I am installing octave and just got this: ---> Cleaning texlive_texmf-full ---> Fetching texlive_texmf-minimal I feel like this should never ever happen. It's bad enough that I already have mactex, so now I have three distributions! I'm not sure what dependencies caused this, but it seems like there should be a way to make sure that texmf-full is treated as a superset of texmf-minimal. -- Ticket URL: <http://trac.macports.org/ticket/19697> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for Mac OS
#19697: double install of texmf -------------------------------------------------------+-------------------- Reporter: jmcdon10@… | Owner: macports-tickets@… Type: defect | Status: closed Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: 1.7.0 Resolution: invalid | Keywords: texlive Port: texlive_texmf-full texlive_texmf-minimal | -------------------------------------------------------+-------------------- Changes (by blb@…): * keywords: => texlive * status: new => closed * resolution: => invalid * port: => texlive_texmf-full texlive_texmf-minimal Old description:
I am installing octave and just got this:
---> Cleaning texlive_texmf-full ---> Fetching texlive_texmf-minimal
I feel like this should never ever happen. It's bad enough that I already have mactex, so now I have three distributions! I'm not sure what dependencies caused this, but it seems like there should be a way to make sure that texmf-full is treated as a superset of texmf-minimal.
New description: I am installing octave and just got this: {{{ ---> Cleaning texlive_texmf-full ---> Fetching texlive_texmf-minimal }}} I feel like this should never ever happen. It's bad enough that I already have mactex, so now I have three distributions! I'm not sure what dependencies caused this, but it seems like there should be a way to make sure that texmf-full is treated as a superset of texmf-minimal. -- Comment: That's actually normal and expected, texlive_texmf-full and texlive_texmf- minimal are different ports and is not a duplication; there is also texlive_base which installs other bits as well. It is split out this way as that's how the distfiles are split out in the OpenBSD ports version which we are currently using. -- Ticket URL: <http://trac.macports.org/ticket/19697#comment:1> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for Mac OS
#19697: double install of texmf -------------------------------------------------------+-------------------- Reporter: jmcdon10@… | Owner: macports-tickets@… Type: defect | Status: closed Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: 1.7.0 Resolution: invalid | Keywords: texlive Port: texlive_texmf-full texlive_texmf-minimal | -------------------------------------------------------+-------------------- Comment(by jmcdon10@…): Replying to [comment:1 blb@…]:
That's actually normal and expected, texlive_texmf-full and texlive_texmf-minimal are different ports and is not a duplication; there is also texlive_base which installs other bits as well. It is split out this way as that's how the distfiles are split out in the OpenBSD ports version which we are currently using. Right I realized that just now as i started digging into the depnedencies... thanks for responding!
-- Ticket URL: <http://trac.macports.org/ticket/19697#comment:2> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for Mac OS
participants (1)
-
MacPorts