#18445: log4cxx Portfile ------------------------------+--------------------------------------------- Reporter: mail@… | Owner: macports-tickets@… Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: Normal | Milestone: Port Submissions Component: ports | Version: 1.7.0 Keywords: | Port: log4cxx ------------------------------+--------------------------------------------- Changes (by macsforever2000@…): * port: => log4cxx -- Ticket URL: <http://trac.macports.org/ticket/18445#comment:1> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for Mac OS

#18445: log4cxx Portfile ------------------------------+--------------------------------------------- Reporter: mail@… | Owner: macports-tickets@… Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: Normal | Milestone: Port Submissions Component: ports | Version: 1.7.0 Keywords: | Port: log4cxx ------------------------------+--------------------------------------------- Comment(by jmr@…): Why are the patches needed? MacPorts uses gcc-4.0 unless you change configure.compiler. Also, unified diffs are strongly preferred. -- Ticket URL: <http://trac.macports.org/ticket/18445#comment:3> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for Mac OS

#18445: log4cxx Portfile ------------------------------+--------------------------------------------- Reporter: mail@… | Owner: macports-tickets@… Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: Normal | Milestone: Port Submissions Component: ports | Version: 1.7.0 Keywords: | Port: log4cxx ------------------------------+--------------------------------------------- Comment(by mail@…): Replying to [comment:3 jmr@…]: The warnings patch is needed, because at the moment you get always a warning when you use log4cxx. This behavior is very anoying inside a development tool, because you can't easily figure out your own warnings. The gcc 4.3 patch was added, because i have added this port for usage with ROS (see http://pr.willowgarage.com/wiki/ROS) and for robotics sometimes OpenMP is used, which started with the gcc 4.2 and matured with 4.3/4.4 a lot. It can probably skipped, but in my opinion adds no aditional danger. I have used the patches in the form as they are submitted to apache for inclusion in log4cxx. Is there some benefit in reformatting them to the right format? -- Ticket URL: <http://trac.macports.org/ticket/18445#comment:5> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for Mac OS