#29719: gnutls: Update to version 2.12.6.1 ---------------------------------+------------------------------------------ Reporter: sqs@… | Owner: ryandesign@… Type: update | Status: assigned Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: 1.9.2 Keywords: haspatch | Port: gnutls ---------------------------------+------------------------------------------ Comment(by ryandesign@…): I attached a revised update proposal, which differs from your patch in that it removes the revision line (because the first revision of any given version of a port should be 0), removes the md5 checksum (because md5 is an obsolete checksum algorithm which I would like to eventually remove from MacPorts), and observes the whitespace conventions of the portfile (spaces not tabs). The reason I'm not committing it yet is that the library version of both libraries has increased from 26 to 27, which means that all ports that use (or can optionally use) gnutls (and possibly some ports that use ports that use gnutls, and so on) must simultaneously have their revisions increased to force a rebuild against the new library, and I haven't yet tried to identify what all those ports are, but there are probably a lot. -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/29719#comment:2> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for Mac OS

#29719: gnutls: Update to version 2.12.6.1 ---------------------------------+------------------------------------------ Reporter: sqs@… | Owner: ryandesign@… Type: update | Status: assigned Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: 1.9.2 Keywords: haspatch | Port: gnutls ---------------------------------+------------------------------------------ Changes (by dports@…): * cc: dports@… (added) Comment: Latest version on the 2.x branch is now 2.12.9, and there's now a new stable branch currently at 3.0.1. I'm sure revbumps are required; I have no idea if there are further compatibility-breaking changes. It would be good to get this port up to date. openssl is a problematic dependency for licensing reasons when it comes to distributing binary packages, and gnutls would be a good alternative in some cases. (nss, and even the Apple-provided openssl may also be options.) For other license-related reasons, I think it'd be better to stick to gcrypt instead of nettle, if there isn't a really strong technical reason to do otherwise. -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/29719#comment:4> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for Mac OS

#29719: gnutls: Update to version 2.12.6.1 ----------------------------------+----------------------------------------- Reporter: sqs@… | Owner: ryandesign@… Type: update | Status: closed Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: 1.9.2 Resolution: fixed | Keywords: haspatch Port: gnutls | ----------------------------------+----------------------------------------- Changes (by dports@…): * status: assigned => closed * resolution: => fixed Comment: I updated the port to v2.12.11, the latest 2.x release, in r84942. I couldn't get 3.x to compile (possibly due to a bug which might be fixed in the next release?) This only increases the library version of libgnutls-openssl and libgnutlsxx, not libgnutls or libgnutls-extra. If ports depend on those libraries, they'll need to be revbumped, but I couldn't find any. -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/29719#comment:6> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for Mac OS