#29739: rpm53 request -------------------------------------+-------------------------------------- Reporter: ryandesign@… | Owner: afb@… Type: request | Status: new Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: Keywords: | Port: rpm53 -------------------------------------+-------------------------------------- Comment(by afb@…): Actually we only have "rpm" and "rpm52" in practice, with the others more or less abandoned... It's possible to build rpm 5.3 and 5.4 and HEAD directly from the CVS using "devtool macports". But there was not enough interest in "RPM ACID" or any of the other development to make a port. In fact there's no ongoing work on package management - in ports - at all, so I left RPM at 5.2.1. But I suppose one '''could''' upgrade rpm52 to rpm53 (probably rename it to "rpm5" or something) What is the main reason to upgrade it ? Is it covered at https://blueprints.launchpad.net/rpm ? -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/29739#comment:1> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for Mac OS

#29739: rpm53 request -------------------------------------+-------------------------------------- Reporter: ryandesign@… | Owner: afb@… Type: request | Status: new Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: Keywords: | Port: rpm53 -------------------------------------+-------------------------------------- Comment(by ryandesign@…): I was referring to http://rpm5.org/ which says the latest is 5.3.6. The only reason I suggested updating rpm / adding a new rpm53 port is that a newer version exists than the newest one available in MacPorts. -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/29739#comment:3> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for Mac OS

#29739: rpm53 request -------------------------------------+-------------------------------------- Reporter: ryandesign@… | Owner: afb@… Type: request | Status: new Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: Keywords: | Port: rpm53 -------------------------------------+-------------------------------------- Comment(by james.kwong@…): I would like to see rpm5.3 released. -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/29739#comment:6> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for Mac OS

#29739: rpm53 request ---------------------------+-------------------- Reporter: ryandesign@… | Owner: afb@… Type: request | Status: closed Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: Resolution: wontfix | Keywords: Port: rpm53 | ---------------------------+-------------------- Comment (by egall@…): Replying to [comment:7 afb@…]:

There's 5.4 too now.

http://rpm5.org/files/rpm/rpm-5.4/

So separate ticket for that? -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/29739#comment:9> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for OS X

#29739: rpm53 request ---------------------------+-------------------- Reporter: ryandesign@… | Owner: afb@… Type: request | Status: closed Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: Resolution: fixed | Keywords: Port: rpm53 | ---------------------------+-------------------- Changes (by afb@…): * status: reopened => closed * resolution: => fixed Comment: Port rpm53 was added in r91205, and port rpm54 was added in r91206... That was probably a rather poor decision, might as well stuck with rpm52. -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/29739#comment:11> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for OS X