[MacPorts] #49699: sshfs gives glib error message
#49699: sshfs gives glib error message --------------------------+-------------------------------- Reporter: bnilsson11@… | Owner: macports-tickets@… Type: defect | Status: new Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: 2.3.4 Keywords: | Port: sshfs --------------------------+-------------------------------- Whenever I use sshfs, I get: (process:478): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_slice_set_config: assertion 'sys_page_size == 0' failed sshfs works, but it is disturbing. I am using OS X 10.11.1 on a MacPro6,1 -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/49699> MacPorts <https://www.macports.org/> Ports system for OS X
#49699: sshfs @2.5: GLib-CRITICAL **: g_slice_set_config: assertion 'sys_page_size == 0' failed ---------------------------+---------------------- Reporter: bnilsson11@… | Owner: dports@… Type: defect | Status: new Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: 2.3.4 Resolution: | Keywords: Port: sshfs | ---------------------------+---------------------- Changes (by ryandesign@…): * owner: macports-tickets@… => dports@… Old description:
Whenever I use sshfs, I get:
(process:478): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_slice_set_config: assertion 'sys_page_size == 0' failed
sshfs works, but it is disturbing.
I am using OS X 10.11.1 on a MacPro6,1
New description: Whenever I use sshfs, I get: {{{ (process:478): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_slice_set_config: assertion 'sys_page_size == 0' failed }}} sshfs works, but it is disturbing. I am using OS X 10.11.1 on a MacPro6,1 -- Comment: You should probably report this problem to the developers of sshfs so that they can fix it. -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/49699#comment:1> MacPorts <https://www.macports.org/> Ports system for OS X
#49699: sshfs @2.5: GLib-CRITICAL **: g_slice_set_config: assertion 'sys_page_size == 0' failed ---------------------------+---------------------- Reporter: bnilsson11@… | Owner: dports@… Type: defect | Status: new Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: 2.3.4 Resolution: | Keywords: Port: sshfs | ---------------------------+---------------------- Comment (by framic5@…): I'm not sure if this is a problem of sshfs itself. I compiled sshfs version 2.5 manually and the error message vanishes: {{{ $ ./sshfs -V SSHFS version 2.5 OSXFUSE library version: FUSE 2.7.3 / OSXFUSE 2.8.2 no mount point $ $ /opt/local/bin/sshfs -V (process:84273): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_slice_set_config: assertion 'sys_page_size == 0' failed SSHFS version 2.5 OSXFUSE library version: FUSE 2.7.3 / OSXFUSE 2.8.2 no mount point }}} -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/49699#comment:4> MacPorts <https://www.macports.org/> Ports system for OS X
#49699: sshfs @2.5: GLib-CRITICAL **: g_slice_set_config: assertion 'sys_page_size == 0' failed ---------------------------+---------------------- Reporter: bnilsson11@… | Owner: dports@… Type: defect | Status: new Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: 2.3.4 Resolution: | Keywords: Port: sshfs | ---------------------------+---------------------- Comment (by framic5@…): I realized that the message arises from an old semaphore implementation adopted from fuse4x. I think the corresponding ticket was #30440. I still don't know what causes the mesasge. Anyhow, since fuse4x is not supported anymore, I tried a similar implementation from osxfuse as workaround: https://github.com/osxfuse/sshfs/commit/14581937282486ab7ce057ec79f226181ef1... I'll attach a patch file to switch from the fuse4x to the osxfuse semaphore implementation. -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/49699#comment:5> MacPorts <https://www.macports.org/> Ports system for OS X
#49699: sshfs @2.5: GLib-CRITICAL **: g_slice_set_config: assertion 'sys_page_size == 0' failed ---------------------------+---------------------- Reporter: bnilsson11@… | Owner: dports@… Type: defect | Status: closed Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: 2.3.4 Resolution: duplicate | Keywords: Port: sshfs | ---------------------------+---------------------- Changes (by aronnax@…): * status: new => closed * resolution: => duplicate Comment: Duplicate of #49494. -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/49699#comment:7> MacPorts <https://www.macports.org/> Ports system for OS X
participants (1)
-
MacPorts