[MacPorts] #43529: Requesting a gcc410 port
#43529: Requesting a gcc410 port ----------------------+-------------------------------- Reporter: rouson@… | Owner: macports-tickets@… Type: request | Status: new Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: 2.2.1 Keywords: gcc | Port: ----------------------+-------------------------------- Please add a port for gcc 4.10, the development trunk, which apparently might ultimately be called gcc 5.0 or something else (http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2014-04/msg00090.html). Damian -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/43529> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for OS X
#43529: Requesting a gcc410 port -----------------------+------------------- Reporter: rouson@… | Owner: mww@… Type: request | Status: new Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: Resolution: | Keywords: Port: gcc410 | -----------------------+------------------- Changes (by ryandesign@…): * keywords: gcc => * owner: macports-tickets@… => mww@… * version: 2.2.1 => * port: => gcc410 * cc: mww@… (removed) Comment: This had been previously requested as part of #43502. -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/43529#comment:1> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for OS X
#43529: Requesting a gcc410 port -----------------------+------------------- Reporter: rouson@… | Owner: mww@… Type: request | Status: new Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: Resolution: | Keywords: Port: gcc410 | -----------------------+------------------- Comment (by rouson@…): Is there likely to be a port of the current gcc trunk soon? Damian -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/43529#comment:3> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for OS X
#43529: Requesting a gcc410 port -----------------------+------------------- Reporter: rouson@… | Owner: mww@… Type: request | Status: new Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: Resolution: | Keywords: Port: gcc410 | -----------------------+------------------- Comment (by petr@…): In know this would be a mess, but should we move towards a cleaner version labeling at this point? The `49` vs. `410` label is really not ideal, and probably it already breaks some of the logic which is in place. -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/43529#comment:9> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for OS X
#43529: Requesting a gcc410 port -----------------------+------------------- Reporter: rouson@… | Owner: mww@… Type: request | Status: new Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: Resolution: | Keywords: Port: gcc410 | -----------------------+------------------- Comment (by mojca@…): I would fully support naming the port `gcc-4.10`. That's nicer and more consistent with `clang`. But I don't want to know how many ports need to be changed and revbumped if we want to change all the gcc ports. -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/43529#comment:10> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for OS X
#43529: Requesting a gcc410 port -----------------------+------------------- Reporter: rouson@… | Owner: mww@… Type: request | Status: new Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: Resolution: | Keywords: Port: gcc410 | -----------------------+------------------- Comment (by petr@…): That's why I've started with "I know this would be a mess" ;-) However, I'd guess (would need checking) there are port which rely on the 4? pattern, and these would break anyway. So just leaving all as is, will not come for free neither. Anyway, could be a great occasion to have closer look at the compiler port group, which could serve as sort of an abstraction layer. -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/43529#comment:11> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for OS X
#43529: Requesting a gcc410 port -----------------------+------------------- Reporter: rouson@… | Owner: mww@… Type: request | Status: new Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: Resolution: | Keywords: Port: gcc410 | -----------------------+------------------- Comment (by sean@…): Replying to [comment:11 petr@…]:
That's why I've started with "I know this would be a mess" ;-)
However, I'd guess (would need checking) there are port which rely on the 4? pattern, and these would break anyway. So just leaving all as is, will not come for free neither. Anyway, could be a great occasion to have closer look at the compiler port group, which could serve as sort of an abstraction layer.
This could serve as a good time to change the ports that rely on gcc to use the compilers group. Then changing the compiler names would happen in one place. -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/43529#comment:12> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for OS X
#43529: Requesting a gcc410 port -----------------------+------------------- Reporter: rouson@… | Owner: mww@… Type: request | Status: new Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: Resolution: | Keywords: Port: gcc410 | -----------------------+------------------- Comment (by egall@…): The next version of gcc might not even be called "4.10", so we might not even have to worry about "410" versus "4.10": https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-06/msg02442.html -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/43529#comment:13> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for OS X
#43529: Requesting a gcc410 port -----------------------+------------------- Reporter: rouson@… | Owner: mww@… Type: request | Status: new Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: Resolution: | Keywords: Port: gcc410 | -----------------------+------------------- Changes (by ryandesign@…): * cc: ryandesign@… (added) Comment: I am working on this. -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/43529#comment:14> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for OS X
#43529: Requesting a gcc410 port -----------------------+-------------------- Reporter: rouson@… | Owner: mww@… Type: request | Status: closed Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: Resolution: fixed | Keywords: Port: gcc410 | -----------------------+-------------------- Changes (by ryandesign@…): * status: new => closed * resolution: => fixed Comment: r123168 -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/43529#comment:15> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for OS X
participants (1)
-
MacPorts