[MacPorts] #37087: kdelibs4 mobile profile
#37087: kdelibs4 mobile profile -------------------------+-------------------------------- Reporter: yue.liu@… | Owner: macports-tickets@… Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: 2.1.2 Keywords: | Port: kdelibs4 -------------------------+-------------------------------- I added mobile variant to kdelibs4. Normally nobody will use mobile profile on OSX, this variant is for kde app developers who want to make an app bundle or standalone installer using libraries compiled from macports, and keep the bundle/pkg as small as possible. This will work for those kde apps that can compile with mobile profiled kdelibs4, such as Calligra. Patches are inherited from meego project. Currently I disabled soprano and nepomuk in this variant because they cause compilation failure. -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/37087> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for Mac OS
#37087: kdelibs4 mobile profile --------------------------+---------------------- Reporter: yue.liu@… | Owner: nicos@… Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: Resolution: | Keywords: haspatch Port: kdelibs4 | --------------------------+---------------------- Changes (by macsforever2000@…): * owner: macports-tickets@… => nicos@… * cc: sharky@… (added) * version: 2.1.2 => * keywords: => haspatch Comment: In the future, please remember to Cc the port maintainer(s). -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/37087#comment:1> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for Mac OS
#37087: kdelibs4 mobile profile --------------------------+---------------------- Reporter: yue.liu@… | Owner: nicos@… Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: Resolution: | Keywords: haspatch Port: kdelibs4 | --------------------------+---------------------- Comment (by nicos@…): Since this variant would disable both Soprano and Nepomuk, it would break many ports which then depend on kdelibs4. It is an open question, but in this case, would not it be a better idea to make it a separate port conflicting with the present kdelibs4 instead of a variant ? This would prevent to break the tree dependence. -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/37087#comment:2> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for Mac OS
#37087: kdelibs4 mobile profile --------------------------+---------------------- Reporter: yue.liu@… | Owner: nicos@… Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: Resolution: | Keywords: haspatch Port: kdelibs4 | --------------------------+---------------------- Comment (by yue.liu@…): Replying to [comment:2 nicos@…]:
Since this variant would disable both Soprano and Nepomuk, it would break many ports which then depend on kdelibs4. It is an open question, but in this case, would not it be a better idea to make it a separate port conflicting with the present kdelibs4 instead of a variant ? This would prevent to break the tree dependence.
Maybe subport should be used? I'm not sure how it works yet. -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/37087#comment:3> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for Mac OS
#37087: kdelibs4 mobile profile --------------------------+---------------------- Reporter: yue.liu@… | Owner: nicos@… Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: Resolution: | Keywords: haspatch Port: kdelibs4 | --------------------------+---------------------- Changes (by sharky@…): * cc: sharky@… (removed) -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/37087#comment:4> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for OS X
participants (1)
-
MacPorts