[MacPorts] #33487: opencore-amr @0.1.3 update
#33487: opencore-amr @0.1.3 update ----------------------------------+----------------------------------------- Reporter: hans@… | Owner: macports-tickets@… Type: update | Status: new Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: 2.0.4 Keywords: maintainer, haspatch | Port: openore-amr ----------------------------------+----------------------------------------- Recently, a new version of opencore-amr was relased. Attached is a diff to the Portfile that brings the port up to this version. Tested on 10.5.8. -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/33487> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for Mac OS
#33487: opencore-amr @0.1.3 update ----------------------------------+----------------------------------------- Reporter: hans@… | Owner: macports-tickets@… Type: update | Status: new Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: 2.0.4 Keywords: maintainer, haspatch | Port: openore-amr ----------------------------------+----------------------------------------- Comment(by hans@…): This is also relevant to the recent update of SoX to 14.4.0, which depends on opencore-amr. Everything seems to work with the new port of SoX on 10.5.8. -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/33487#comment:1> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for Mac OS
#33487: opencore-amr @0.1.3 update ---------------------------------+------------------------------------------ Reporter: hans@… | Owner: macports-tickets@… Type: update | Status: new Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: Keywords: haspatch maintainer | Port: openore-amr ---------------------------------+------------------------------------------ Changes (by macsforever2000@…): * keywords: maintainer, haspatch => haspatch maintainer * version: 2.0.4 => Comment: Your patch is not unified diff. Please use the -u flag when making a patch as per the [http://guide.macports.org/index.html#development.patches.portfile guide]. -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/33487#comment:2> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for Mac OS
#33487: opencore-amr @0.1.3 update ---------------------------------+------------------------------------------ Reporter: hans@… | Owner: macports-tickets@… Type: update | Status: new Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: Keywords: haspatch maintainer | Port: openore-amr ---------------------------------+------------------------------------------ Comment(by hans@…): Sorry; better diff attached. -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/33487#comment:3> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for Mac OS
#33487: opencore-amr @0.1.3 update ---------------------------------+------------------------------------------ Reporter: hans@… | Owner: macports-tickets@… Type: update | Status: new Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: Keywords: haspatch maintainer | Port: openore-amr ---------------------------------+------------------------------------------ Comment(by macsforever2000@…): Thanks but it looks the same as the original patch and still is not unified. -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/33487#comment:4> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for Mac OS
#33487: opencore-amr @0.1.3 update ---------------------------------+------------------------------------------ Reporter: hans@… | Owner: macports-tickets@… Type: update | Status: new Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: Keywords: haspatch maintainer | Port: openore-amr ---------------------------------+------------------------------------------ Comment(by hans@…): Aaargh, sorry, uploaded the right one now, rewriting Portfile-opencore-amr.diff -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/33487#comment:5> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for Mac OS
#33487: opencore-amr @0.1.3 update ---------------------------------+------------------------------------------ Reporter: hans@… | Owner: macports-tickets@… Type: update | Status: new Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: Keywords: haspatch maintainer | Port: openore-amr ---------------------------------+------------------------------------------ Comment(by macsforever2000@…): Thanks, that's better. One minor issue, you replaced the sha256 checksum with a sha1 checksum. Please use the sha256 checksum. -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/33487#comment:6> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for Mac OS
#33487: opencore-amr @0.1.3 update ---------------------------------+------------------------------------------ Reporter: hans@… | Owner: macports-tickets@… Type: update | Status: new Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: Keywords: haspatch maintainer | Port: openore-amr ---------------------------------+------------------------------------------ Comment(by hans@…): Updated. Is there any particular reason why sha256 is preffered (or, for that matter, why rmd160 is preffered, as I often see in Portfiles)? -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/33487#comment:7> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for Mac OS
#33487: opencore-amr @0.1.3 update ---------------------------------+------------------------------------------ Reporter: hans@… | Owner: dports@… Type: update | Status: assigned Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: Keywords: haspatch maintainer | Port: openore-amr ---------------------------------+------------------------------------------ Changes (by dports@…): * owner: macports-tickets@… => dports@… * status: new => assigned -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/33487#comment:8> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for Mac OS
#33487: opencore-amr @0.1.3 update ----------------------------+----------------------------------------------- Reporter: hans@… | Owner: dports@… Type: update | Status: closed Priority: Normal | Milestone: Component: ports | Version: Resolution: fixed | Keywords: haspatch maintainer Port: openore-amr | ----------------------------+----------------------------------------------- Changes (by dports@…): * status: assigned => closed * resolution: => fixed Comment: Thanks, applied in r90552. sha256 is preferred over sha1 because it's a stronger hash. We like to have two different hashes in case one of them is broken; usually that's sha256 and rmd160 unless there's a good reason to do otherwise. -- Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/33487#comment:9> MacPorts <http://www.macports.org/> Ports system for Mac OS
participants (1)
-
MacPorts